首页|多发性骨髓瘤合并轻链型淀粉样变性患者临床分析

多发性骨髓瘤合并轻链型淀粉样变性患者临床分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨多发性骨髓瘤(MM)合并轻链型(AL)淀粉样变性患者的临床特征和预后情况.方法 选取2017年1月至2022年1月MM患者124例,其中MM合并AL淀粉样变性患者31例(MM合并AL组),单纯MM患者93例(MM组).两组患者均予以硼替佐米为主的化疗方案诱导治疗.比较两组患者临床特征、疗效、预后.结果 两组患者性别、年龄、DS分期、ISS分期比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),MM合并AL组患者λ型轻链受累比例高于MM组(P<0.05).两组患者WBC、PLT、ALP、Hb、白蛋白、血肌酐、血钙、β2微球蛋白、24 h尿蛋白、BNP水平比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),MM合并AL组LDH水平高于MM组(P<0.05).MM合并AL组总有效率(ORR)低于MM组(P<0.05).MM合并AL组获得完全缓解(CR)患者比例、获得非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)及以上患者比例均低于MM组(P>0.05).MM合并AL组中位无进展生存期(PFS)与中位总生存期(OS)分别为23个月和31个月,MM组分别为45个月和56个月.MM合并AL组患者OS短于MM组(P<0.05).MM合并AL组中心脏淀粉样变患者中位OS短于无心脏淀粉样变患者(P<0.05).结论 MM合并AL淀粉样变性患者较单纯MM患者疗效反应差,总体生存期短.
Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of multiple myeloma(MM)patients with light chain(AL)amyloidosis.Methods A total of 260 MM patients were selected from Hangzhou first people's Hospital from January 2017 to January 2022,including 31 MM patients with AL(the MM with AL group)and 229 MM patients with MM alone(the MM group).Patients in both groups were treated with bortezomib based induction chemotherapy.Clinical characteristics,efficacy,and prognosis were compared between the two groups.Results There were no significant differences in gender,age,Durie-Salmon(DS)stage,and International Staging System(ISS)stage between the two groups(P>0.05).The λ-type AL involvement rate in the MM combined with AL group was higher than that in the MM group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the levels of white blood cell(WBC),platelet(PLT),alkaline phosphatase(ALP),Hemoglobin(Hb),albumin,serum creatinine,serum calcium,β2 microglobulin,24h urine protein,and type-B natriuretic peptide(BNP)between the two groups(P>0.05),and the MM combined with AL group lactate dehydrogenase(LDH)level was higher than that in the MM group(P<0.05).The objective response rate(ORR)of the MM combined with AL group was lower than that of the MM group(P<0.05).The proportion of patients with complete remission(CR)and the proportion of patients with very good partial remission(VGPR)in the MM combined with AL group were lower than those in the MM group(P>0.05).The median progression-free survival(PFS)and median overall survival(OS)of the MM combined with AL group were 23 months and 31 months,while those of the MM group were 45 months and 56 months.The OS of the MM combined with AL group was shorter than this of the MM group(P<0.05).The median OS of patients with cardiac amyloidosis in the MM combined with AL group was shorter than that of patients without cardiac amyloidosis(P<0.05).Conclusion Patients with MM combined with AL amyloidosis have poorer curative effect and shorter overall survival than patients with simple MM.

Multiple myelomaAmyloidosisClinical featuresPrognosis

陈蕾妃、钱申贤

展开 >

310022 杭州市第一人民医院城北院区(杭州市老年病医院)

多发性骨髓瘤 淀粉样变性 临床特征 预后

2024

浙江临床医学
浙江中医药大学 浙江省科普作家协会医学卫生委员会

浙江临床医学

影响因子:0.52
ISSN:1008-7664
年,卷(期):2024.26(1)
  • 3