首页|PVP联合正脊复位与PKP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的疗效比较

PVP联合正脊复位与PKP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的疗效比较

扫码查看
目的 探讨经皮椎体成形术(PVP)联合正脊复位(体位复位联合手法复位)与经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)治疗单节新鲜骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)的临床疗效.方法 选取2020年6月至2022年6月收治的OVCF患者120例,分为PVP联合正脊复位组及PKP组,各60例,比较手术时间、术中出血量、术后骨水泥渗漏、术后椎体前缘高度恢复情况、术后住院天数、术后疼痛及生活质量改善情况(术后1 d、1月、3月随访VAS 评分及Barthel指数).结果 PVP联合正脊复位组手术时间较PKP组短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组术中出血量、术后骨水泥渗漏、术后住院天数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后疼痛及生活能力均明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),而术后组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);PVP联合正脊复位组及PKP组对比,术前均可恢复椎体高度,术后PKP组高度恢复情况更佳,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).结论 两种方法治疗新鲜单节段OVCF均可获得良好短期及中期止痛效果,并有效改善患者术后生活质量及活动能力;PVP联合正脊复位操作更为简单,手术时间更短,PKP对椎体高度恢复效果稍优于PVP联合正脊复位,两者各有优势,因此临床中应根据患者情况个性化选择两种手术方案.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)combined with spinal reduction(position reduction combined with manual reduction)and percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)in the treatment of fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture(OVCF).Methods Retrospective analysis of 120 OVCF patients admitted from June 2020 to June 2022,2 years,divided into two groups,60 cases,comparing the operation time,the amount of intraoperative bleeding,postoperative cement leakage,postoperative hospitalization days,postoperative pain and life ability improvement(VAS score and Barthel index at 1 day,1 month and 3 months).Results The operation time of PVP combined with ridge reduction was shorter than the PKP group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).The intraoperative blood loss,postoperative cement leakage and postoperative hospitalization days were comparable between the two groups,there was no significant difference(P>0.05).The postoperative pain and average living ability improved significantly in both groups,statistically significant comparison before surgery(P<0.01).However,in the postoperative comparison between the two groups,there was no significant difference(P>0.05).PVP combined with ridge reduction and PKP group can restore the vertebral height.The recovery height recovery was better in the postoperative PKP group,the difference was significant(P<0.01).Conclusion Both methods of fresh single-segment OVCF can provide good short-term and medium-term analgesia and activity of patients.PVP combined with ridge reduction is simpler,operation time is shorter.PKP is slightly better than PVP combined with spine reduction.Both have different advantages.Therefore,the two surgical options should be selected according to the patient's situation.

Percutaneous vertebroplastyPercutaneous kyphoplastyOsteoporotic vertebral compression fractureSpinal reduction

王凯、周黎辉、郑奕、王徐灿

展开 >

315700 宁波市第四医院

经皮椎体成形术 经皮椎体后凸成形术 骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折 正脊复位

2024

浙江临床医学
浙江中医药大学 浙江省科普作家协会医学卫生委员会

浙江临床医学

影响因子:0.52
ISSN:1008-7664
年,卷(期):2024.26(5)
  • 17