首页|RISS阻滞对胸腔镜手术患者术后恢复质量的影响

RISS阻滞对胸腔镜手术患者术后恢复质量的影响

扫码查看
目的 观察菱形肌-肋间肌-低位前锯肌平面(RISS)阻滞对胸腔镜手术患者术后恢复质量的影响.方法 选取2023年1月至6月本院择期行胸腔镜胸科手术患者64例,随机分为RISS阻滞组(R组)和肋间神经阻滞组(I组),每组各32例.R组在麻醉诱导前行超声引导下患侧RISS阻滞,注射0.5%罗哌卡因40 mL.I组在关胸前行胸腔镜直视下肋间神经阻滞,每个目标肋间隙注射0.5%罗哌卡因5 mL.术毕均予患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA).R组患者在注射完成20 min后测定阻滞范围.记录两组患者术后24 h及148 h的恢复质量评分(QoR-15);记录拔管后15 min、出PACU时、术后4 h、6 h、24 h和48 h静息时及咳嗽时疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分;记录术后PCIA首次按压时间、术后48 h内PCIA有效按压次数、静脉给药镇痛补救次数和麻醉相关并发症.结果 RISS阻滞范围头端至T3水平,尾端至T10水平,T3~T9水平前胸壁可达锁骨中线,后胸壁达肩胛线,T10水平前达腋前线,后至腋后线.R组术后24 h和48 h的QoR-15评分高于I组(P<0.05).R组在拔管后5 min及出PACU时静息和咳嗽时VAS评分、术后4 h和6 h静息VAS评分均显著低于I组(P<0.05);其余时间点VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).R组术后PICA首次按压时间比I组更迟(P<0.05).两组术后48 h内PCIA按压总次数、静脉镇痛补救次数及麻醉相关并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 与肋间神经阻滞相比,超声引导下RISS阻滞可为胸腔镜手术患者提供良好的围术期镇痛效果,缓解术后早期疼痛,改善术后康复.
Objective To observe the effect of rhomboid-intercostal and sub-serratus plane block(RISS)on the quality of recovery postoperatively in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery.Methods Sixty-four patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery were randomly divided into RISS group(group R)and intercostal nerve block group(group I),32 cases for each group.Patients in group R received ultrasound-guided RISS block with 40 mL of 0.5%ropivacaine before anesthesia induction.While patients in group I received intercostal nerve block under thoracoscopic direct vision before closing the chest,and 5 mL of 0.5%ropivacaine was injected into each target intercostal space.All patients were given patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA)postoperatively.The block range of patients in group R was measured 20 min after injection.The quality of recovery(QoR-15)scores of the two groups were recorded at 24 h and 48 h after operation.The visual analogue scale(VAS)scores at rest and cough were recorded at 15 min after extubation,at the time of discharging from post anesthesia care unit,and at 4 h,6 h,24 h and 48 h after operation.The time of first pressing PCIA,the times of effective pressing PCIA and intravenous rescue analgesic and the anesthesia-related complications within 48 h after operation were recorded.Results The block range of RISS was from T3 to T10 level.At the T3-T9 level,the block range extended from the midclavicular line of the anterior chest wall to the scapular line of the posterior chest wall.At the T10 level,it extended from the anterior axillary line to the posterior axillary line.The QoR-15 scores of group R at 24 h and 48 h after operation were higher than that of group I(both P<0.05).The VAS scores at rest and coughing of group R were lower than those of group I at 5 min after extubation and the time of discharging from post anesthesia care unit,and the VAS scores at rest of group R were lower than those of group I at 4 h and 6 h after operation(both P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score at other time points(P>0.05).Compared with group I,the time of first pressing PICA was more later in group R(P<0.05).While there was no significant difference in the times of effective pressing PCIA and intravenous rescue analgesic and the complications within 48 h after operation between the two groups.(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with intercostal nerve block,ultrasound-guided RISS block can provide perfect perioperative analgesic effect for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery,alleviate early postoperative pain and improve the quality of recovery postoperatively.

Ultrasound-guidedNerve blockRhomboid intercostal and sub-serratus plane blockVideo-assisted thoracic surgeryThe quality of recovery postoperatively

宋棋梁、李继鹏、孙建良

展开 >

310053 浙江中医药大学第四临床医学院

312000 浙江省绍兴市人民医院

310006 西湖大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院

超声引导 神经阻滞 菱形肌-肋间肌-低位前锯肌平面阻滞 胸腔镜手术 术后恢复质量

浙江省医药卫生科技计划

2024KY1727

2024

浙江临床医学
浙江中医药大学 浙江省科普作家协会医学卫生委员会

浙江临床医学

影响因子:0.52
ISSN:1008-7664
年,卷(期):2024.26(5)
  • 12