首页|基于品质因数评价定位方向对胸部CT影像质量-辐射剂量的影响

基于品质因数评价定位方向对胸部CT影像质量-辐射剂量的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨基于品质因数评估定位方向对于胸部CT平扫影像质量和辐射剂量的影响。方法 纳入2020年12月至2021年5月行胸部CT平扫的240例门诊患者,数字表法随机分为三组。采用不同定位方向进行扫描定位,组1行常规0°定位像,组2行(0°和90°)双定位像,组3行(180°和90°)双定位像。由2位高年资放射诊断医师评价横断位胸部CT影像质量,包括主观影像质量评分、信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR),记录并计算容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)、有效剂量(ED)及体型特异性剂量估算(SSDE),基于影像品质因数(FOM)评估几种定位方式的影像质量-辐射剂量风险效益比。结果 240例患者均成功完成胸部CT检查,在四个层面影像上三组的主观影像质量评分均≥4分,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。三组中CTDIvol、DLP、ED、SSDE差异有统计学意义(F=60。871、75。747、75。747,132。18,P<0。001)。与组1相比,组2的ED降低29。1%、SSDE降低27。4%;组3的ED降低33。9%、SSDE降低28%。三组影像FOM组间比较,除气管分叉层面外,其余三个层面均有统计学差异(P<0。05)。组3采用(180°和90°)双定位像方式,具有更高的FOM。结论 使用双定位像较常规0°定位像进行胸部CT检查,可明显降低患者的辐射剂量,且影像质量满足临床诊断要求。其中采用(180°和90°)双定位像方式,影像质量-辐射剂量风险效益比更高。
Objective To assess radiation exposure and image quality during chest CT by using orthogonal and lateral topography based on the figure of merit.Methods From December 2020 to May 2021,240 outpatients who underwent chest CT scan were randomly divided into three groups by digital table method.Group 1 had 0° topography,group 2 had(0° and 90°)topography,and group 3 had(180° and 90°)topography.Two senior radiologists who blind the scanning parameters evaluated the image quality of cross-sectional chest CT,including subjective image quality score,signal-to-noise ratio(SNR),and contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR).Volume CT dose index(CTDIvol),dose-length multiplier(DLP),effective dose(ED)and body-specific dose estimation(SSDE)were recorded and calculated,and image quality-radiation dose risk-benefit ratios of several positioning methods were evaluated based on the figure of merit(FOM).Results All 240 patients successfully completed the chest CT examination,and the subjective image quality scores of the three groups were≥4 points in the four levels of images,and there was no statistical significance between the groups(P>0.05).There were significant differences in CTDIvol,DLP,ED and SSDE among the three groups(F=60.871,75.747,75.747,132.18,P<0.001).Compared with group 1,ED and SSDE in group 2 were decreased by 29.1%and 27.4%respectively.In group 3,ED decreased by 33.9%and SSDE decreased by 28%.Compared with FOM group in the three groups,there were statistical differences in the other three levels except the tracheal bifurcation level(P<0.05).Group 3 had a higher FOM.Conclusion Compared with conventional 0° topography,orthogonal topography can significantly reduce the radiation dose of patients,and the image quality can meet the clinical diagnostic requirements.The image quality-radiation dose risk-benefit ratio with(180° and 90°)topography was higher.

Chest CTScout imageThe figure of merit Image qualityRadiation dose

王欣堃、王振

展开 >

312000 浙江省绍兴市柯桥区妇幼保健院

310006 杭州市第一人民医院

胸部CT 定位像 品质因数 影像质量 辐射剂量

杭州市生物医药和健康产业发展扶持科技专项浙江省基础公益项目分析测试项目

2021WJCY254LGC22H180003

2024

浙江临床医学
浙江中医药大学 浙江省科普作家协会医学卫生委员会

浙江临床医学

影响因子:0.52
ISSN:1008-7664
年,卷(期):2024.26(8)