首页|北京市通州区绿地土壤重金属源解析及风险评价

北京市通州区绿地土壤重金属源解析及风险评价

扫码查看
[目的]北京市通州区土地利用类型变化较大,本研究对通州区绿地土壤开展重金属调查,进行源解析和风险评价,评判现阶段的绿地利用是否符合清洁安全的要求并提出重金属风险防控建议。[方法]采集并测定研究区60个表层土壤样品中的pH值及镉(Cd)、铬(Cr)、铅(Pb)、铜(Cu)、锌(Zn)、砷(As)和汞(Hg)等7种重金属全量。运用主成分分析法和绝对因子得分-多元线性回归(APCS-MLR)受体模型等方法进行源解析;采用地积累指数法、潜在生态风险评价法进行重金属污染评价。[结果]研究区土壤中Cd、Cr、Pb、Hg、As、Cu和Zn等7种重金属平均质量分数分别是0。53、47。87、11。95、0。25、6。71、4。64、51。21 mg·kg-1,所有点位的重金属质量分数均没有超过 GB 15618-2018《农用地土壤污染风险管控标准》。主成分分析表明:Cd、Pb、Hg、As受人为源影响,主要来自煤炭燃烧、交通、工业和农业活动污染;Zn受自然源影响,和土壤母质有关;Cu和Cr受混合来源影响,来自土壤母质和农业活动污染。根据受体模型对重金属元素进行定量源解析,发现在表层有一定累积的Cd大部分来自人为源(92%);Hg分别来自工业源(29%)、燃煤和交通源(17%)、农业源(13%),还有35%的未知源,推测未知源可能是混合源。对绿地土壤进行环境质量评价,地积累指数和潜在生态危险指数显示Cd和Hg有较高生态风险响应。研究区综合潜在风险值大部分处于轻微和中等潜在生态风险,有少量点位处于重度生态风险。[结论]通州区绿地土壤整体风险等级处于中低风险,引起风险的主要重金属元素为Cd和Hg,二者是生态风险优先控制元素,可从燃煤、交通和工业排放方面进行控制。图5表4参32
Sources and contamination assessment of heavy metals in the green land soils in Tongzhou District,Beijing
[Objective]The types of land use in Tongzhou District of Beijing have changed greatly.Heavy metals in the soil of green land were investigated,source analysis and risk assessment were carried out to understand whether the current use of green land meets the requirements of cleanliness and safety,and suggestions on risk prevention and control of heavy metals were given.[Method]The pH values and total amounts of heavy metals including Cd,Cr,Pb,Hg,As,Cu,and Zn in 60 surface soil samples from the study area were determined.Source apportionment was carried out using Principal Component Analysis and the Absolute Principal Component Scores-Multiple Linear Regression(APCS-MLR)receptor model.The assessment of heavy metal element pollution was conducted using the Geo-accumulation Index method and the Potential Ecological Risk Assessment method.[Result]The average contents of 7 heavy metals Cd,Cr,Pb,Hg,As,Cu and Zn in the soil were 0.53,47.87,11.95,0.25,6.71,4.64 and 51.21 mg·kg-1,while the average content of the remaining elements were below the background.All of the samples'heavy metal concentrations were less than the screening values for Soil Pollution Risk Control Standards for Agricultural Land(GB 15618-2018).Principal component analysis demonstrated that Cd,Pb,Hg and As were influenced by human sources,including coal combustion,traffic pollution,industrial and agricultural activities pollution;Zn originated from natural sources and was related to the soil parent material;Cu and Cr were mixed sources reaulted by soil parent materials and agricultural pollution.The contribution rates of sources calculated by APCS-MLR were as follows,a certain amount of Cd accumulated on the surface came mostly from human sources(92%);Hg was from source 3(29%),source 1(17%),source 4(13%),and there were also 35%unknown sources,which were suggested as mixed sources.Moreover,sources 1,3,and 4 were all anthropogenic sources,while source 2 was a natural source.Environmental quality evaluation of green soil was investigated through the ground accumulation index,which illustrated that Cd and Hg performed a higher ecological risk response.Most of the comprehensive potential risk values in the study area were slight and medium potential ecological risks,only few points were belonged to severe ecological risks.[Conclusion]The study shows that the overall risk level of green land soil in Tongzhou District is in the middle and low risk.The main elements causing the risk are Cd and Hg,which are the priority control elements of ecological risk,and can be controlled from the control of coal burning,traffic and industrial emissions.[Ch,5 fig.4 tab.32 ref.]

green land soilheavy metalcontamination assessmentsource apportionment

孙经宇、孙向阳、李素艳、王晨晨、岳宗伟

展开 >

北京林业大学林学院,北京 100083

绿地土壤 重金属 风险评价 来源解析

科学技术部科技基础资源调查专项

2021FY100802

2024

浙江农林大学学报
浙江农林大学

浙江农林大学学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.929
ISSN:2095-0756
年,卷(期):2024.41(3)