首页|产后忧郁量表的汉化及信度、效度检验

产后忧郁量表的汉化及信度、效度检验

扫码查看
目的 汉化产后忧郁量表(MBS),并检验中文版MBS的信效度.方法 根据Brislin翻译模型对MBS进行翻译、回译、跨文化调适和预调查,形成中文版MBS.采用便利抽样法抽取山东省3所三甲综合医院产科中心产妇进行调查,检验中文版MBS的信效度.根据专家咨询的评分结果评价内容效度,以中文版爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)作为效标评价中文版MBS的效标关联效度,采用探索性因子和验证性因子分析评价结构效度;计算Cronbach's α、折半信度评价信度.绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估预测效能.结果 发放500份问卷,回收有效问卷479份,问卷有效率为95.80%.中文版MBS包括母婴交流、婴儿喂养、角色适应、母亲职责、家庭接纳和社会支持6个维度,共32个条目.各条目水平内容效度指数为0.900~1.000,量表平均水平的内容效度指数为0.990;中文版MBS得分与中文版EPDS得分的相关系数为0.675(P<0.05).探索性因子分析提取6个公因子,累计方差贡献率为74.581%;验证性因子分析结果显示,近似误差均方根为0.014,拟合优度指数为0.896,比较拟合指数为0.996,递增拟合指数为0.996,规范拟合指数为0.913,非规范拟合指数为0.995,模型拟合度较好.总Cronbach's α为0.924,折半信度系数为0.765;各维度Cronbach's α为0.809~0.956,折半信度系数为0.807~0.966.ROC曲线下面积为0.909(95%CI:0.880~0.937),最佳临界值为75.5分时,约登指数最大为0.698,灵敏度为0.874,特异度为0.824.结论 中文版MBS信效度良好,可作为我国产妇产后忧郁的评估工具.
Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Maternal Blue Scale
Objective To translate the Maternal Blue Scale (MBS) into Chinese,and evaluate the reliability and validi-ty.Methods The MBS was translated back-translated,culturally adapted and pre-tested according to the Brislin trans-lation model to develop the Chinese version of MBS.Postpartum women from obstetrics centers in three tertiary gener-al hospitals in Shandong Province were selected using convenience sampling method to assess the reliability and va-lidity of the Chinese version of MBS.Content validity was evaluated based on expert ratings.Criterion-related validity was evaluated using the Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) as the criterion.Structur-al validity was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's α and split-half reliability.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate predictive validity.Results Totally 500 questionnaires were allocated,and 479 valid ones were recovered,with an effective re-covery rate of 95.80%.The Chinese version of MBS consisted of 32 items across 6 dimensions:mother-infant commu-nication,infant feeding,role adaptation,maternal responsibilities,family acceptance and social support.The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.900 to 1.000,and the scale-level content validity index/average was 0.990.The correlation coefficient between the Chinese version of MBS scores and the Chinese version of EPDS scores was 0.675 (P<0.05).Exploratory factor analysis extracted 6 common factors,with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 74.581%.Confirmatory factor analysis indicated good model fit,with a root mean square error of approximation of 0.014,a goodness of fit index of 0.896,a comparative fit index of 0.996,an incremental fit index of 0.996,a normed fit index of 0.913,and a Tucker-Lewis index of 0.995.The overall Cronbach's α was 0.924,and the split-half reliability was 0.765.The Cronbach's α of each dimension ranged from 0.809 to 0.956,and the split-half reliabil-ity ranged from 0.807 to 0.966.The area under the ROC curve was 0.909 (95%CI:0.880-0.937).At the optimal cut-off score of 75.5,the Youden index reached its maximum of 0.698,with a sensitivity of 0.874 and a specificity of 0.824.Conclusion The Chinese version of MBS has good reliability and validity,and it is suitable to evaluate mater-nal blue among Chinese postpartum women.

Maternal Blue Scalereliabilityvaliditycross-cultural adaptation

王炜、李智慧、孔燕、于桂玲

展开 >

青岛大学护理学院,山东 青岛 266021

青岛市妇女儿童医院,山东 青岛 266034

产后忧郁量表 信度 效度 跨文化调适

2024

预防医学
浙江省预防医学会

预防医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.002
ISSN:2096-5087
年,卷(期):2024.36(12)