首页|环境公益侵权诉讼中的举证责任与分配规则

环境公益侵权诉讼中的举证责任与分配规则

扫码查看
《民法典》为我国以保护环境公益为目的的环境民事公益诉讼和生态环境损害赔偿诉讼提供了实体法依据,但此类公益诉讼是否适用《民法典》第1230条因果关系的举证责任倒置规则仍有解释的空间.该条并没有对私益诉讼和公益诉讼进行区分,最高人民法院对于不同类型的环境侵权诉讼中证明责任的分配也采取了相似的立场,即仅要求原告提供初步的证明材料.不同诉讼类型统一适用同一套规则有利于法律体系内在逻辑的统一,不仅不会使得原被告双方严重失衡,反而更有利于实现生态环境保护的制度目标.
Burden of Proof and Allocation Rules in Environmental Public Interest Tort Litigation
The Civil Code provides a legal basis for environmental civil public interest litigation and ecological environmental damage compensation litigation in China with the aim of protecting environmental public interests.However,there is still room for interpretation regarding whether the reverse burden of proof rule in Article 1230 of the Civil Code applies to such public interest litigation.The article does not distinguish between private litigation and public interest litigation,and the Supreme People's Court of P.R.C has taken a similar stance on the alloca-tion of burden of proof in different types of environmental tort litigation,requiring only the plaintiff to provide pre-liminary evidence.Applying the same set of rules to different types of litigation is beneficial for the internal the le-gal system,ensuring a balance between the parties and ultimately promoting the institutional goal of ecological envi-ronmental protection.

environmental public interesttort litigationallocation of burden of proofreverse burden of proofCivil Code

张冉

展开 >

中国政法大学法律硕士学院,北京 100088

环境公益 侵权诉讼 证明责任 举证责任 民法典

中国政法大学科研创新青年项目

23ZFQ820003

2024

中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)
中南民族大学

中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.696
ISSN:1672-433X
年,卷(期):2024.44(3)
  • 18