首页|人工智能生成物的侵权及解决路径

人工智能生成物的侵权及解决路径

扫码查看
人工智能技术对社会生活和生产的影响越来越大,引发了众多的法律争议,人工智能生成物的特征及其侵权相关问题在学界备受关注.客体方面,人工智能生成物的独创性判断较为困难,从人格和思想表达的角度评判更有利于保护人类作者,而不能只从生成物的客观价值角度进行简单评判.主体方面,结合各国学说,从各方对于生成物思想贡献的角度进行比较更为合理.权利方面,由于人工智能这个处于权利核心位置的对象缺乏人格和民法地位,导致权利网难以构建,由于依旧存在法理上的漏洞,现有的解决方式普遍选择回避这一点.人工智能生成物对于复制权、改编权、汇编权以及人格权都面临侵权风险.针对这些问题,有自治路径、立法路径、司法路径、行政路径四种可能的解决方式,其中的行政路径更具可行性和合理性.
Infringement of AI-generated Works and Resolution Pathways
Artificial intelligence technology has increasingly influenced social life and production,triggering numerous legal disputes.The characteristics of AI-generated works and their infringement-related issues have at-tracted much attention in the academic community.In terms of objects,it is difficult to judge the originality of AI-generated works.It is more conducive for protecting human authors to evaluate them from the perspective of person-ality and ideological expression,rather than simply judging them from the perspective of their objective value.In terms of the subject,it is more reasonable to compare the contributions of different parties to the ideological content of the generated works based on various theories around the world.In terms of rights,since AI,which is at the core of rights,lacks personality and civil law status,it is difficult to build a rights network.Due to the existence of legal loopholes,existing solutions generally choose to avoid this issue.AI-generated works face the risk of infringement of copyright,adaptation right,compilation right,and personality right.There are four possible solutions to these prob-lems:the autonomous approach,the legislative approach,the judicial approach,and the administrative approach.Among them,the administrative approach is more feasible and reasonable.

artificial intelligenceworkoriginalitypersonalityideology

叶兆驰

展开 >

武汉大学法学院/法律与科技研究中心,湖北武汉 430072

人工智能 生成物 独创性 人格 思想

2024

中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)
中南民族大学

中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.696
ISSN:1672-433X
年,卷(期):2024.44(5)
  • 10