首页|CDK4/6抑制剂联合芳香化酶抑制剂类药物用于HR+/HER2晚期乳腺癌一线治疗的临床综合评价

CDK4/6抑制剂联合芳香化酶抑制剂类药物用于HR+/HER2晚期乳腺癌一线治疗的临床综合评价

扫码查看
目的 比较CDK4/6抑制剂哌柏西利、瑞博西利、阿贝西利联合芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)类药物一线治疗HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌的临床综合价值,以期为临床用药实践提供参考.方法 根据《抗肿瘤药品临床综合评价技术指南(2022年版试行)》构建CDK4/6抑制剂联合AI类药物用于HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌一线治疗的临床综合评价指标体系,并通过网状meta分析、专家咨询等方法进行各维度的临床综合评价.结果 在安全性方面,哌柏西利、瑞博西利和阿贝西利联合AI的总体不良反应发生率相似,但阿贝西利联合AI的3级以上不良反应发生率最低.在有效性方面,三种治疗方案在无进展生存期和总生存期方面彼此间差异无统计学意义.在经济性方面,阿贝西利的治疗所需费用略低于哌柏西利.在创新性方面,阿贝西利的用药方式和作用靶点更多样,哌柏西利的专利价值最低但可促进技术国产化.在适宜性方面,阿贝西利适应证和医保目录涵盖范围更广,但哌柏西利的药品剂型更多样,瑞博西利适宜性相对较差.在可及性方面,阿贝西利的可获得性和可负担性均优于哌柏西利,瑞博西利尚未在中国上市,可及性最低.结论 综合来看,阿贝西利在6个维度均表现良好,其临床综合价值高于哌柏西利和瑞博西利.建议临床应用时结合患者基本情况选择适当的药物.
Clinical comprehensive evaluation of CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with aromatase inhibitors drugs for first-line treatment for patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer
Objective To compare the clinical comprehensive value of CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib,ribociclib,and abemaciclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors(AIs)as first-line treatment for patients with HR+/HER2-advanced breast cancer,and to provide reference for clinical medication use.Methods According to"Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation Technical Guidelines for Antineoplastic Drugs(2022 Trial Version)",a clinical comprehensive evaluation system for CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with AIs for first-line treatment of HR+/HER2-advanced breast cancer was established with network meta-analysis,expert consultation,and other methods.Results The clinical comprehensive evaluation showed that in terms of safety,the overall incidence of adverse reactions of palbociclib,ribociclib,and abemaciclib in combination with AIs was similar,but abemaciclib in combination with AIs had the lowest incidence of adverse reactions(grade 3 or above).In terms of efficacy,there was no significant difference among the three treatment regimens concerning progression-free survival and overall survival.As to cost-effectiveness,the treatment cost of abemaciclib was slightly lower than that of palbociclib.In terms of innovation,abemaciclib had more diverse drug administration methods and target mechanisms,while palbociclib had the lowest patent value but could promote domestic technology.As for suitability,abemaciclib had a broader indication and coverage in the medical insurance catalog,while palbociclib had more diverse drug formulations,and ribociclib had relatively poor suitability.In terms of accessibility,abemaciclib had better availability and affordability compared to palbociclib,and ribociclib was not yet available in China,thus poor accessibility.Conclusion Overall,abemaciclib demonstrates good performance in all six dimensions,with better clinical comprehensiveness than that of palbociclib and ribociclib.Appropriate drugs should based on patients'baseline characteristics in clinical practice.

comprehensive clinical evaluationCDK4/6 inhibitoraromatase inhibitorbreast cancer

张佳雯、李琴、范国荣、程学芳

展开 >

上海交通大学医学院附属第一人民医院临床药学科,上海 200080

±海市松江区新浜镇社区卫生服务中心药剂科,上海 201605

临床综合评价 CDK4/6抑制剂 芳香化酶抑制剂 乳腺癌

2021年上海市"医苑新星"青年医学人才培养资助计划——临床药师项目

沪卫人事[2022]65号

2024

中南药学
湖南省药学会

中南药学

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.736
ISSN:1672-2981
年,卷(期):2024.22(1)
  • 8