首页|车辆段上盖超高层建筑室内结构噪声分析与评价

车辆段上盖超高层建筑室内结构噪声分析与评价

扫码查看
国内标准多采用等效A声级来评价车致振动引起的二次结构噪声,评价范围为16~200 Hz。鉴于A声级对低频部分的大幅度衰减,本文根据国内某车辆段上盖超高层建筑的实测数据,对室内结构噪声沿建筑高度分布的规律进行分析,并通过与响度的对比,对等效A声级的适用性进行验证。结果表明:车致振动引起的上盖超高层建筑室内噪声频率分布范围随楼层变化,楼层越高,频带越窄;分析频带由标准规定的16~200 Hz变为有效噪声分布频带时,等效A声级的变化幅度难以被人耳察觉,响度级的变化却能明显被人耳感知;200 Hz以上能量占比小,但对响度评价的影响较大。若仍以16~200 Hz等效A声级来评价上盖超高层建筑室内结构噪声,会低估其响亮程度。研究结果对有效评价上盖建筑结构噪声的影响具有理论指导意义。
Analysis and Evaluation of Indoor Structural-borne Noise Characteristics in Ultra High-rise Structure above a Metro Depot
Domestic standards often use equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level (ECAWSPL) to evalu-ate structure-borne noise induced by subway in the evaluation range of 16-200 Hz.However,the A-weighted sound pres-sure level significantly attenuates in the low-frequency portion.In this work,according to the measurement data in an ultra high-rise building above a metro depot,the distribution pattern of structure-borne noise was analyzed,and the applicability of the ECAWSPL was verified through the comparison of loudness.The results show that the frequency range of indoor noise in the ultra high-rise building decreases with the floor increasing,the higher the floor level is,the narrower the frequen-cy band is.When the frequency band of the analysis frequency changing from the standard-suggested 16-200 Hz to the actu-al frequency band distribution,the amplitude changing in the ECAWSPL is hardly to be detected by human audition,while the change in the loudness level can be clearly perceived by the human audition;the proportion of energy above 200 Hz is small,but its impact on loudness is significant and should not be ignored.If the ECAWSPL of 16-200 Hz is still used to es-timate the structure noise in ultra high-rise buildings in this case,it is very possible to underestimate its loudness.The results of this research have theoretical significance for effective evaluation of the structure-borne noise induced by subways.

acousticsmetro depotover-track buildingstructure-borne noiseequivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levelloudness level

杜彦芊、鞠龙华、王安斌

展开 >

上海工程技术大学 城市轨道交通学院,上海 201620

声学 车辆段 上盖建筑 二次结构噪声 等效A声级 响度级

2024

噪声与振动控制
中国声学学会

噪声与振动控制

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.622
ISSN:1006-1355
年,卷(期):2024.44(6)