首页|血小板糖蛋白抗体的差异性分布对儿童原发免疫性血小板减少症临床疗效的影响

血小板糖蛋白抗体的差异性分布对儿童原发免疫性血小板减少症临床疗效的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨3种血小板糖蛋白(platelet glycoprotein,GP)特异性抗体(抗GPⅠb/Ⅸ、GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa和GPⅠa/Ⅱa抗体)在儿童原发免疫性血小板减少症(primary immune thrombocytopenia,ITP)患者中的差异分布对其一线治疗后疗效的影响.方法 回顾性分析2019年12月至2023年12月于绵阳市中心医院住院的儿童ITP患者54例,根据抗体检测结果将其分为:A1组(抗GP Ⅰb/Ⅸ抗体阳性,18例)和A2组(抗GP Ⅰb/Ⅸ抗体阴性,36例),B1组(抗GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa抗体阳性,30例)和B2组(抗GPⅡb/Ⅲa抗体阴性,24例),C1组(抗GP Ⅰa/Ⅱa抗体阳性,16例)和C2组(抗GP Ⅰa/Ⅱa抗体阴性,38例).所有患儿均给予标准一线方案治疗.分析抗体分布与治疗后血小板(platelet,PLT)计数变化趋势及疗效的关系.结果 治疗后,各组患儿的PLT计数均随时间推移而显著升高(P<0.05);治疗后24h、72h、7d,A1组患儿的PLT计数均显著低于同期A2组(P<0.05);B1组和B2组患儿不同时间点的PLT计数比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后7d,C1组患儿的PLT计数显著低于C2组(P<0.05).治疗后1个月,A1组和C1组患儿的疗效分别显著低于A2组和C2组(P<0.05),B1组和B2组患儿的疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.081).结论 不同抗体分布的ITP患儿一线方案治疗后的疗效存在差异,抗GP Ⅰb/Ⅸ抗体和抗GPⅠa/Ⅱa抗体阳性的患儿疗效更差,抗GPⅡb/Ⅲa抗体阳性和阴性患儿的疗效无差异.
Influence of differential distribution of platelet glycoprotein antibodies on clinical efficacy of primary immune thrombocytopenia in children
Objective To investigate the effect of the differential distribution of three platelet glycoprotein(GP)specific antibodies(anti-GPⅠb/Ⅸ,GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa and GPⅠa/Ⅱa antibodies)on the efficacy of first-line treatment in children with primary immune thrombocytopenia(ITP).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 54 children with ITP who were hospitalized in Mianyang Central Hospital from December 2019 to December 2023.According to the antibody test results,they were divided into:group A1(anti-GPⅠb/Ⅸ antibody positive,18 cases)and group A2(anti-GPⅠb/Ⅸ antibody negative,36 cases),group B1(anti-GP Ⅱb/Ⅲ a antibody positive,30 cases)and group B2(anti-GP Ⅱb/Ⅲ a antibody negative,24 cases),group C1(anti-GPⅠa/Ⅱa antibody positive,16 cases)and group C2(anti-GPⅠa/Ⅱa antibody negative,38 cases).All patients were given standard first-line treatment.The relationship between the distribution of antibodies and the trend of counting of platelet(PLT)after treatment was analyzed.Results After treatment,PLT counts in all groups increased significantly over time(P<0.05).The PLT count in group Al was significantly lower than that in group A2 at 24h,72h and 7days after treatment(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in PLT count between group B1 and group B2 at different time points(P>0.05).At 7 days after treatment,the PLT count in group C1 was significantly lower than that in group C2(P<0.05).At one month after treatment,the efficacy of children in group A1 and group C1 were significantly lower than those in group A2 and group C2,respectively(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the efficacy between group B1 and group B2(P=0.081).Conclusion There are differences in the efficacy of ITP children with different distribution of antibodies after first-line treatment,the efficacy of children with positive anti-GPⅠb/Ⅸ antibody and anti-GPⅠa/Ⅱ a antibody are worse,and the efficacy of children with positive and negative anti-GP Ⅱb/Ⅲ a antibody is not different.

Primary immune thrombocytopeniaPlatelet glycoprotein specific antibodyChildPlatelet count

史洋溢、吴勇

展开 >

绵阳市中心医院儿科,四川绵阳 621000

原发免疫性血小板减少症 血小板糖蛋白特异性抗体 儿童 血小板计数

2024

中国现代医生
中国医学科学院

中国现代医生

影响因子:1.571
ISSN:1673-9701
年,卷(期):2024.62(28)