首页|甘草次酸和叶酸共修饰双靶向pH敏感黄芩苷/姜黄素共载脂质体的制备及评价

甘草次酸和叶酸共修饰双靶向pH敏感黄芩苷/姜黄素共载脂质体的制备及评价

扫码查看
目的 优化甘草次酸(GA)和叶酸(FA)共修饰双靶向pH敏感黄芩苷/姜黄素共载脂质体(GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur)的处方工艺,并对其进行评价.方法 采用薄膜分散超声法制备GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur,以包封率、不同pH释放介质中溶出曲线相似因子(f2)、粒径和多分散指数(PDI)为评价指标,使用单因素考察和Box-Behnken设计-响应面法筛选出最佳处方工艺;对GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur的外观形态、粒径、不同pH浓度的体外释放度等进行评价;通过溶血性实验评估GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur的生物相容性;采用细胞CCK-8法考察黄芩苷、姜黄素、黄芩苷/姜黄素(质量比为5∶1)混合溶液、GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur对肝癌细胞HepG2的体外增殖抑制作用;通过小鼠组织药物分布实验,考察GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur体内的肝靶向性;探究GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur(120、60、30 mg·kg-1)对H22荷瘤小鼠的抑瘤率、HE染色后肿瘤组织病理学、血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平的影响.结果 GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur的最佳制备工艺为:黄芩苷与姜黄素质量比为5∶1,琥珀酸胆固醇单酯(CHEMS)与磷脂质量比为2∶10,DSPE-PEG 2000与磷脂质量比为4∶100,DSPE-PEG-GA与磷脂质量比为2∶100,水化体积为10 mL,磷脂与药物质量比7.95∶1,磷脂与胆固醇质量比6.53∶1,超声破碎时间为69 s.经响应面优化制得的GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur黄芩苷包封率为90.90%,姜黄素包封率为90.97%,平均粒径82.5 nm,释放行为具有缓释特性.黄芩苷对HepG2细胞的半数抑制浓度(1C50)大约是姜黄素的5倍,GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur的IC5.较混合溶液低.体内药效评价结果表明,GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur抑瘤率与5-氟脲嘧啶(5-FU)相当;给药组的肿瘤坏死细胞数量变少,肿瘤细胞的排列疏松,细胞呈现不同程度变小;血清中TNF-α和IL-6水平均较模型组显著降低(P<0.01).结论 制备的GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur安全性好,肝靶向性高,具有良好的抑制肝肿瘤作用.
Preparation and evaluation of dual-targeting pH-sensitive baicalin/curcumin co-loaded liposomes
Objective To optimize the formulation process of dual-targeted pH-sensitive baicalin/curcumin co-loaded liposomes(GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur)and evaluate their properties.Methods GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur was prepared using a thin film dispersion ultrasonication method.The evaluation criteria included encapsulation efficiency,similarity factor(f2)of release curves in different pH media,particle size,and polydispersity index(PDI).The optimal formulation process was determined through single-factor testing and Box-Behnken design-response surface methodology to evaluate the liposomes'morphology,particle size,and in vitro release profiles at different pH levels.The biocompatibility of GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur was assessed through a hemolysis test.The in vitro inhibitory effect of baicalin,curcumin,baicalin/curcumin(mass ratio 5∶1)mixed solution,GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur on liver cancer cells(HepG2)was examined using the CCK-8 assay.The liver targeting of GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur in vivo was investigated through a mouse tissue distribution experiment.Subsequently,pharmacological experiments were conducted to study the antitumor efficacy of GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur on H22 tumor-bearing mice and its impact on histopathological changes of tumor tissue after HE staining,serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels.Results The optimal preparation method for GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur was as follows:The ratio of baicalin to curcumin was 5∶1,the ratio of cholesteryl succinate(CHEMS)to phospholipids was 2∶10,the ratio of DSPE-PEG 2000 to phospholipids was 4∶100,the ratio of DSPE-PEG-GA to phospholipids was 2∶100,the hydration volume was 10 mL,the ratio of phospholipids to drugs was 7.95:1,and the ratio of phospholipids to cholesterol was 6.53∶1,and the ultrasonic crushing time was 69 s.The optimized GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur exhibited an encapsulation efficiency of 90.90%for baicalin and 90.97%for curcumin,with an average particle size of 82.5 nm and sustained-release behavior.The IC50 of baicalin for HepG2 cells was approximately five times that of curcumin,and the IC50 of GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur was lower than that of the mixed solution.The in vivo pharmacodynamic evaluation results show that the tumor inhibition rate of GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur was comparable to that of 5-fluorouracil(5-FU).The number of necrotic cells in the treated group decreased,the arrangement of tumor cells becomes loose,and the cells showed varying degrees of shrinkage,and the levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the serum were significantly lower than those in the model group(P<0.01).Conclusion The GA/FA-pH-Lip@Bai/Cur prepared had good safety and high liver targeting,and has good inhibitory effects on liver tumors.

baicaleincurcuminpH-sensitive liposomesfolic acidglycyrrhetinic acidliver cancerliver targeting

汪洁、顾雪梅、张思雨、倪思雨、石菲、吕志阳、陈静、高霞、肖伟

展开 >

南京中医药大学翰林学院,江苏泰州 225300

南京中医药大学,江苏南京 210023

黄芩苷 姜黄素 pH敏感脂质体 叶酸 甘草次酸 肝癌 肝靶向性

2024

药物评价研究
天津药物研究院 中国药学会

药物评价研究

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.199
ISSN:1674-6376
年,卷(期):2024.47(12)