首页|电子支气管镜肺泡灌洗术对老年重症肺炎并发呼吸衰竭患者临床肺部感染评分、肺功能及炎症指标的影响

电子支气管镜肺泡灌洗术对老年重症肺炎并发呼吸衰竭患者临床肺部感染评分、肺功能及炎症指标的影响

扫码查看
目的:探讨电子支气管镜肺泡灌洗术对老年重症肺炎并发呼吸衰竭患者临床肺部感染评分(clinical pulmonary infection score,CPIS)、肺功能及炎症指标的影响。方法:选取2021年6月—2023年6月利津县中心医院呼吸内科收治的85例老年重症肺炎并发呼吸衰竭患者作为研究对象,根据随机数表法将患者分为对照组(42 例)与试验组(43 例)。对照组接受常规抗病毒、抗感染及呼吸机等综合治疗措施,而试验组在对照组基础上给予电子支气管镜肺泡灌洗术,比较两组临床疗效、血清炎症指标、肺功能指标、呼吸力学指标及CPIS评分。结果:试验组治疗有效率比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗前,两组血清炎症指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05),治疗后,两组白细胞计数(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、外周血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)及降钙素原(PCT)低于治疗前,且试验组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗前,两组肺功能指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);治疗后,两组第 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、最大通气量(MMV)、最大呼气中期流量(MMEF)、肺总量(TLC)和功能残气量(FRC)高于治疗前,且试验组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗前,两组呼吸力学指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);治疗后,两组气道阻力(RAW)、呼吸做功量(WOB)较治疗前降低,肺动态顺应性(Cdyn)较治疗前升高,且试验组RAW、WOB指标低于对照组,Cdyn高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗前,两组CPIS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);治疗后,两组CPIS评分低于治疗前,且试验组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论:老年重症肺炎并发呼吸衰竭患者使用电子支气管镜肺泡灌洗术治疗可取得良好的效果,能改善肺功能指标、呼吸力学指标及CPIS评分,并降低血清炎症指标水平,从而提高临床疗效。
Effect of Electronic Bronchoscope Alveolar Lavage on Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score,Pulmonary Function and Inflammatory Indexes in Elderly Patients with Severe Pneumonia Complicated with Respiratory Failure
Objective:To explore the effect of electronic bronchoscope alveolar lavage on clinical pulmonary infection score(CPIS),pulmonary function and inflammatory indexes in elderly patients with severe pneumonia complicated with respiratory failure.Method:Eighty-five elderly patients with severe pneumonia complicated with respiratory failure who admitted to the Respiratory Department of Lijin Central Hospital from June 2021 to June 2023 were selected as the study objects,the patients were divided into the control group(42 cases)and the experimental group(43 cases)according to random number table method.The control group was given comprehensive treatment measures such as conventional antiviral,anti-infection and ventilator,while the experimental group was given electronic bronchoscope alveolar lavage on the basis of the control group,the clinical efficacy,serum inflammatory indexes,pulmonary function indexes,respiratory mechanics indexes and CPIS score were compared between two groups.Result:The effective rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,there were no significant differences in the serum inflammatory indexes between two groups(P>0.05);after treatment,the white blood cell count(WBC),C-reactive protein(CRP),peripheral blood neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio(NLR)and procalcitonin(PCT)in two groups were lower than those before treatment,and which in the experimental group were lower than the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,there were no significant differences in the pulmonary function indexes between two groups(P>0.05);after treatment,the forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1),maximum ventilation volume(MMV),maximum mid-expiratory flow(MMEF),total lung capacity(TLC)and functional residual capacity(FRC)in two groups were higher than those before treatment,and those in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,there were no significant differences in the respiratory mechanics indexes between two groups(P>0.05);after treatment,the airway resistance(RAW)and work of breathing(WOB)in two groups were lower than those before treatment,and the pulmonary dynamic compliance(Cdyn)were higher than those before treatment,and the RAW and WOB in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group,and Cdyn was higher than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no significant difference in CPIS score between two groups(P>0.05);after treatment,the CPIS scores of two groups were lower than those before treatment,and that in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The use of electronic bronchoscope alveolar lavage in elderly patients with severe pneumonia complicated with respiratory failure can achieve good results,improve pulmonary function indexes,respiratory mechanics indexes and CPIS scores,and reduce serum inflammatory indexes,thereby improving clinical efficacy.

Severe pneumoniaElectronic bronchoscopeAlveolar lavageRespiratory failurePulmonary functionInflammatory indexesClinical pulmonary infection score

陈志刚

展开 >

利津县中心医院 山东 利津 257400

重症肺炎 电子支气管镜 肺泡灌洗术 呼吸衰竭 肺功能 炎症指标 临床肺部感染评分

2024

中外医学研究
中国医院管理杂志社

中外医学研究

影响因子:1.149
ISSN:1674-6805
年,卷(期):2024.22(12)
  • 16