首页|不同配比哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗AECOPD合并铜绿假单胞菌感染的效果和安全性对比

不同配比哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗AECOPD合并铜绿假单胞菌感染的效果和安全性对比

扫码查看
目的:探究并对比不同配比哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)合并铜绿假单胞菌感染的效果和安全性.方法:选取 2019 年 8 月—2023 年 8 月于印江县人民医院接受治疗的 60 例AECOPD合并铜绿假单胞菌感染患者作为研究对象,按照药物配比的不同将患者分为低配比组(n=30)与高配比组(n=30).低配比组接受配比为 4∶1 的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦,高配比组接受配比为 8∶1 的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦,两组均连续治疗 1 周.比较两组治疗前后炎症指标、肺功能、疾病严重程度,治疗结束后评价临床疗效,同时记录治疗期间不良反应发生情况.结果:治疗后,两组白细胞计数(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)及改良英国医学研究会呼吸困难指数(mMRC)降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),低配比组较高配比组略低,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组第 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、一秒率(FEV1/FVC%)升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),低配比组较高配比组略高,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).低配比组总有效率为 86.67%,略高于对照组的 73.33%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);低配比组不良反应发生率为 30.00%,高于高配比组的 10.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:AECOPD合并铜绿假单胞菌感染患者按 4∶1 和 8∶1 配比的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦具有相近效果,但 8∶1配比的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦可降低不良反应发生率.
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Ratios of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of AECOPD Complicated with Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection
Objective:To explore and compare the efficacy and safety of different ratios of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD)complicated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.Method:A total of 60 AECOPD patients complicated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection who treated in Yinjiang County People's Hospital from August 2019 to August 2023 were selected as the study objects,and they were divided into the low ratio group(n=30)and the high ratio group(n=30)based on different drug ratios.The low ratio group was given Piperacillin/Tazobactam at a ratio of 4∶1,while the high ratio group was given Piperacillin/Tazobactam at a ratio of 8∶1,two groups were treated continuously for 1 week.The inflammatory indexes,lung function and disease severity before and after treatment were compared between two groups,the clinical efficacy was evaluated after treatment,and the occurrence of adverse reactions during treatment was recorded.Result:After treatment,the white blood cell count(WBC),C-reactive protein(CRP),procalcitonin(PCT),acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ)and modified British Medical Research Council dyspnea index(mMRC)in two groups were decreased,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05),those in the low ratio group were slightly lower than those in the high ratio group,but the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).After treatment,the forced expiratory volume in the one second(FEV1),forced vital capacity(FVC),and one-second rate(FEV1/FVC%)of two groups increased,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05),those in the low ratio group were slightly lower than those in the high ratio group,but the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The total effective rate in the low ratio group was 86.67%,which was slightly higher than 73.33%in the control group,but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the low ratio group was 30.00%,which was higher than 10.00%in the high ratio group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The treatment of AECOPD patients complicated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection by Piperacillin/Tazobactam at a ratio of 4∶1 and 8∶1 has similar effects,but 8∶1 ratio of Piperacillin/Tazobactam can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.

Piperacillin/TazobactamAcute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePseudomonas aeruginosa infectionClinical efficacySafety

高燕

展开 >

印江县人民医院 贵州 印江 555200

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦 急性加重期慢性阻塞性肺疾病 铜绿假单胞菌感染 临床疗效 安全性

2024

中外医学研究
中国医院管理杂志社

中外医学研究

影响因子:1.149
ISSN:1674-6805
年,卷(期):2024.22(15)
  • 16