首页|BAL与NPPV治疗COPD伴肺不张患者的效果

BAL与NPPV治疗COPD伴肺不张患者的效果

扫码查看
目的:探讨纤支镜肺泡灌洗(BAL)与无创正压通气(NPPV)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)伴肺不张患者的效果。方法:选取 2020 年 2 月—2023 年 2 月浠水县中医院呼吸科收治的 84 例COPD伴肺不张患者。根据随机数表法将其分为治疗组和对照组,各 42 例。两组均给予常规药物治疗,治疗组采用BAL治疗,对照组采用NPPV治疗。比较两组治疗前后呼吸困难、肺功能指标、动脉血气指标、相关指标。结果:治疗后,两组改良的医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(mMRC)评分降低,治疗组mMRC评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗后,两组用力肺活量(FVC)、第 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、FEV1 占预计值的百分比(FEV1%pred)均升高,治疗组FVC、FEV1、FEV1%pred均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗后,两组动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)均显著升高,动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)降低,治疗组SaO2、PaO2 均高于对照组,PaCO2 低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。治疗后,两组可溶性触发受体表达的基因 1(sTREM-1)和高迁移率族蛋白B1(HMGB1)水平均显著降低,治疗组sTREM-1、HMGB1 水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论:BAL与NPPV治疗均能有效改善COPD伴肺不张患者的症状和肺功能,且BAL治疗的效果优于NPPV治疗。两种治疗方式均能降低COPD伴肺不张患者的sTREM-1、HMGB1 水平,提示两种治疗方式均能减轻炎症反应,且BAL治疗的抗炎作用优于NPPV治疗。
Effects of BAL and NPPV in the Treatment of COPD Patients with Atelectasis
Objective:To investigates the effects of bronchoalveolar lavage(BAL)and non invasive positive pressure ventilation(NPPV)in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)patients with atelectasis.Method:A total of 84 patients with COPD and atelectasis admitted to the Respiratory Department of Xishui County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from February 2020 to February 2023 were selected.According to random number table method,the patients were divided into treatment group and control group,42 cases in each group.Both groups were given conventional drug treatment,BAL treatment in the treatment group and NPPV treatment in the control group.Dyspnea,pulmonary function indexes,arterial blood gas indexes and related indexes before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.Result:After treatment,the modified Medical Research Council(mMRC)score of the two groups decreased,and the mMRC score of the treatment group was lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the forced vital capacity(FVC),forced expiratory volume in the first second(FEV1)and FEV1 in the predicted value(FEV1%pred)of the two groups were increased,and the FVC,FEV1 and FEV1%pred of the treatment group were higher than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,arterial oxygen saturation(SaO2)and arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2)were significantly increased in both groups,while arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2)was decreased,SaO2 and PaO2 in the treatment group were higher than those in the control group,and PaCO2 was lower than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the levels of soluble trigger receptor expression gene 1(sTREM-1)and high mobility group protein B1(HMGB1)were significantly decreased in both groups,and the levels of sTREM-1 and HMGB1 in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:BAL and NPPV treatment can effectively improve the symptoms and lung function of COPD patients with atelectasis,and BAL treatment is better than NPPV treatment.Both treatments can reduce sTREM-1 and HMGB1 levels in COPD patients with atelectasis,suggesting that both treatments can reduce inflammatory response,and BAL treatment has better anti-inflammatory effect than NPPV treatment.

Bronchoscopic alveolar lavageNon invasive positive pressure ventilationChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseAtelectasisSoluble trigger receptor gene 1High mobility group protein B1

王戈

展开 >

浠水县中医院 湖北 浠水 438200

纤支镜肺泡灌洗 无创正压通气 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 肺不张 可溶性触发受体表达的基因1 高迁移率族蛋白B1

2024

中外医学研究
中国医院管理杂志社

中外医学研究

影响因子:1.149
ISSN:1674-6805
年,卷(期):2024.22(28)