友善还是敌对?——重新审视霍布斯对国际无政府状态的思考
Amity or Enmity?—Rethinking Hobbes's Legacy of International Anarchy
张楠1
作者信息
摘要
对于自然状态是否可以代表霍布斯对国际关系的看法,当代学者们莫衷一是.国际关系中现实主义学派认为,霍布斯式的国际无政府状态仍是以战争为基调的自然状态.另有研究者认为,相比于自然状态下的个人,主权国家有着更高的防卫能力与和平相处的意愿,这使得国际无政府状态更趋于和平而非战争.但后者的观点忽视了非军事手段对主权国家的威胁;在非军事手段的相互威胁下,霍布斯式的国际无政府状态在本质上仍然是相互争斗的自然状态.
Abstract
Concerning whether Hobbes's state of nature account represents his ac-count of international anarchy,the contemporary academics fail to reach an agreement.The classical realists in international relations insist that Hobbes's account of the international an-archy intrinsically resembles his war-inclining state of nature.Some Hobbes scholars argue that the sovereign states under Hobbes's account acquire the peace-inclining character and the sufficient capability for self-defense,and this consequently makes the international anarchy more peace-inclining.Nonetheless,the latter underestimate the non-military threats,and under the premise that sovereign states can destroy each other by non-military manners,the international anarchy in the Hobbeisan context is essentially a war-inclining state of nature.
关键词
霍布斯/国际无政府状态/自然状态Key words
Hobbes/international anarchy/state of nature引用本文复制引用
基金项目
内蒙古大学高层次人才科研启动基金(10000-23112101/062)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据