首页|平等主义amour-propre的证成困境——对新康德主义卢梭研究的一项评述

平等主义amour-propre的证成困境——对新康德主义卢梭研究的一项评述

The Predicament of the Egalitarian Amour-propre—A Critical Review of the Neo-Kantians'Rousseau Studies

扫码查看
对amour-propre的阐述是卢梭批判不平等的基础,它被视为一种过度的社会性自爱,表现为对自身优越得到承认的渴求,是不平等的首要心理动机.近来,研究者重估了这一概念,认为它仅是一种欲求平等道德尊重的无害自爱,并且由于与平等主义政治构成内在呼应,卢梭的道德和社会理论能在amour-propre下得到统合.这一解释成为近年卢梭研究中影响极大的范式.但其对amour-propre内涵的重估无法得到文本支持,以此为基础串联卢梭的理论还将导致逻辑上的不连贯.因此,有必要恢复对此概念的合理理解,并由此思考卢梭理论的整体性.
The evaluation of amour-propre is the basis of Rousseau's critique of inequality.In the Second Discourse,amour-propre is described as an excessive self-love that manifests as a desire to gain the recognition of one's superiority over others,thus being the principal psychological motivation of the inequalities between men.In recent years,however,researchers began to reassess this concept,arguing that it is originally a harmless passion that desires only to be esteemed as an equal moral being.The researchers thus pointed out that,since the passion finds its echo in Rousseau's egalitarian politics,Rousseau's moral and social theory could be taken as a coherent system in terms of the problem of amour-propre.This interpretation has gradually become a dominant one,especially in Anglophone Rousseau studies.However,by reexamining the'egalitarian'reading,it can be seen that their understanding of amour-propre cannot be adequately supported by direct textual evidence;and it leads to exegetic incoherence when attempting to develop a single thread of Rousseau's theory on this basis.Therefore,it is necessary to restore a proper understanding of amour-propre and rethink Rousseau's system.

Jean-Jacques Rousseauamour-propreamour de soiNeo-Kantianism

党成孝

展开 >

山东大学政治学与公共管理学院、山东大学亚太研究所

卢梭 自尊 自爱 新康德主义

2024

政治思想史
天津师范大学

政治思想史

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.151
ISSN:1674-8662
年,卷(期):2024.15(4)