首页|谁来书写哲学的历史?——弗雷德与威廉斯论哲学的历史书写

谁来书写哲学的历史?——弗雷德与威廉斯论哲学的历史书写

扫码查看
本文细致分析弗雷德的历史化的哲学史理想和威廉斯有关哲学史首先是哲学的主张,着重考察各自的理论动机及其实际的理论后果,从而揭示这两种激进立场所面临的理论困境:弗雷德为了捍卫哲学史的事实基础接受了一种素朴的实在论历史哲学,未能意识到历史学家的理性重构对于包括哲学史在内的一切历史的重要性;威廉斯延续科林伍德的历史哲学,将建构性的重演视为哲学史的根基,但并未能严肃对待其可能产生的相对主义危险:一切重演都享有同样的合法性.
Who Shall Write the History of Philosophy?Frede and Williams on the Historiography of Philosophy
This paper carefully analyzes Michael Frede's ideal of a historicized history of philosophy and Bernard Williams's claim that the history of philosophy is first and foremost philosophical,focusing on their theoretical motivations and their practical implications,in order to reveal the theoretical dilemmas faced by these two radical positions:Fred,advocating for a realist philosophy of history,prioritizes the factual basis of the history of philosophy,neglecting the essential role of the historian's interpretive framework.Williams,influenced by Collingwood,emphasizes the importance of constructive reenactment but overlooks the potential for relativism inherent in such an approach that all reenactments enjoy the same legitimacy.

吴天岳

展开 >

北京大学外国哲学研究所

历史书写 学说志 建构性的重演

2025

世界哲学
中国社会科学院哲学所

世界哲学

北大核心
影响因子:0.221
ISSN:1671-4318
年,卷(期):2025.(1)