首页|肝性脑病临床指南和共识的质量评价及推荐意见研究

肝性脑病临床指南和共识的质量评价及推荐意见研究

扫码查看
目的:采用AGREEⅡ和RIGHT工具对肝性脑病(HE)指南性文件的方法学质量和报告质量进行评价,并对推荐意见及证据进行总结和比较,为未来HE指南性文件的制定及临床实践提供参考.方法:计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、PubMed、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、维普(VIP)、万方(Wanfang)、WHO、国际指南协作网(GIN)、美国国立指南文库(NGC)、英国国家临床优化研究所(NICE)、苏格兰院际间协作网(SIGN)和医脉通数据库(Medlive),检索时限为2003 年1 月至2023 年1 月.由两名肝病研究人员独立使用AGREEⅡ和RIGHT对纳入指南性文件的方法学质量和报告质量进行评价,并对循证方法制订的指南性文件的推荐意见和证据进行整理和比较.结果:共纳入14 篇文献,其中9 篇指南,5 篇共识;中文2 篇,英文12 篇;使用循证方法制订的有12篇.B级7 部,C级7 部.AGREEⅡ各领域平均得分分别为:范围与目的(40.87%)、参与人员(26.98%)、制订严谨性(23.96%)、表达清晰性(47.22%)、应用性(17.26%)、编辑独立性(18.75%).RIGHT各领域平均得分分别为:基本信息(60.42%)、背景(40.85%)、证据(43.57%)、推荐意见(43.88%)、评审和质量保证(16.96%)、资金资助与利益冲突声明和管理(17.56%)、其他方面(38.10%).主要推荐意见涉及筛查与诊断、治疗、营养管理和预防.结论:纳入的HE指南性文件在方法学质量和报告质量方面整体得分较低.在方法学质量方面,参与人员、制订严谨性、应用性和编辑独立性仍有待提高.在报告质量方面,评审和质量保证,资金资助与利益冲突声明和管理领域需要进一步报告.未来可增进HE放射性示踪成像和神经生理学研究,为HE的主动诊断提供进一步参考,并形成"药物治疗-营养管理-复发预防"的HE管理模式.
Quality assessment and recommendations of clinical guidelines and consensus on hepatic encephalopathy
Objective:To provide a reference for the development of future guidelines and clinical practices on Hepatic Encephalopathy(HE),the methodological quality and reporting quality of HE guidelines were evaluated using AGREE Ⅱ and RIGHT tools.Additionally,the recommendations and evidence were summarized and compared.Methods:The databases including CNKI,PubMed,CBM,VIP,Wanfang,WHO,GIN,NGC,NICE SIGN and Medline databanse.The search period was from January 2003 to January 2023.Two liver disease researchers independently evaluated the methodological quality and reporting quality of the included guideline documents using AGREE Ⅱ and RIGHT,sorted out and compared the recommendations and evidence of the guideline documents formulated by evidence-based methods.Results:A total of 14 articles were included in this analysis,of which 9 were guidelines and 5 were expert consensus,including 2 Chinese articles and 12 English articles.Twelve studies were developed using evidence-based methods.Seven films were rated B and seven were rated C.The average scores of each domain of AGREE Ⅱ were scope and purpose(40.87%),stakeholder involvement(26.98%),rigor of development(23.96%),clarity of expression(47.22%),applicability(17.26%)and editorial independence(18.75%).The average scores of RIGHT were basic information(60.42%),background(40.85%),evidence(43.57%),recommendations(43.88%),review and quality assurance(16.96%),funding and conflict of interest statement and management(17.56%)and other aspects(38.10%).The key recommendations cover screening and diagnosis,treatment,nutrition management and prevention.Conclusion:The included HE guideline documents had overall low scores in methodological quality and reporting quality.In terms of methodological quality,participants,rigor of development,applicability,and editorial independence still need to be improved.In terms of reporting quality,review and quality assurance,funding and conflict of interest declarations and management areas need further reporting.In the future,radiotracer imaging and neurophysiology research can be improved to provide further reference for active diagnosis of HE,and to form a HE management model of"drug treatment,nutrition management and recurrence prevention".

hepatic encephalopathyAGREE ⅡRIGHTguidelinesrecommendations

何新、张卓然、贺俊芝、杜宏波、丁鹏、康雷

展开 >

北京中医药大学东直门医院(北京,100700)

湖南省直中医医院

北京中医药大学肝病研究院

肝性脑病 AGREEⅡ RIGHT 指南性文件 推荐意见

全国中医临床优秀人才研修项目

国中医人教函[2022]-1

2024

中西医结合肝病杂志
中国中西医结合学会,湖北中医学院

中西医结合肝病杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.908
ISSN:1005-0264
年,卷(期):2024.34(2)
  • 27