首页|气囊压迫止血器初次放气减压时间不同对桡动脉介入术后安全性的系统评价

气囊压迫止血器初次放气减压时间不同对桡动脉介入术后安全性的系统评价

扫码查看
目的:系统评价桡动脉介入术后气囊压迫止血器不同初次放气减压时间对病人术后安全性的影响,并探究最佳初次放气时间。方法:系统检索 PubMed、Web of Science、EMbase、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、维普、万方数据库中 2005 年 1 月 1 日—2021年 12月 15日公开发表的包含桡动脉介入术后气囊压迫止血器不同初次放气时间对术后不良反应及并发症影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用 RevMan 5。4 软件进行 Meta分析,运用 R4。2 软件进行敏感性分析。结果:共纳入 27 项研究,涉及病人 5 843 例。Meta分析结果显示,与术后>2h初次放气减压相比,术后 2h初次放气减压急性桡动脉闭塞(RAO)发生率[RR=4。90,95%CI(1。69,14。24),P =0。003]、肢体麻木发生率[RR=3。16,95%CI(2。14,4。65),P<0。000 01]、肢体发绀发生率[RR=4。35,95%CI(2。36,8。02),P<0。01]更低。与术后 2h初次放气减压相比,术后<2h初次放气减压急性 RAO发生率[RR=0。44,95%CI(0。20,0。97),P=0。04],肢体肿胀发生率[RR=0。41,95%CI(0。27,0。63),P<0。000 1]、肢体麻木发生率[RR=0。49,95%CI(0。34,0。70),P<0。000 1],肢体发绀发生率[RR=0。37,95%CI(0。18,0。75),P =0。006],病人穿刺部位疼痛发生率[RR=0。50,95%CI(0。34,0。73),P =0。000 3]更低。采用逐一剔除文献方法进行敏感性分析,剔除前后结果未发生明显变化,提示 Meta分析结果基本稳定。结论:现有证据表明,气囊压迫止血器初次放气减压时间距桡动脉介入术后<2h比 2h或>2h更能有效预防术后急性RAO及肢体肿胀、麻木、发绀、穿刺部位疼痛的发生。
A Systematic Review of the Safety of Balloon Compression Hemostat with Different Initial Decompression Time after Radial Artery Intervention
Objective:To evaluate the safety of different initial deflation and decompression time of balloon compression hemostat on postoperative safety of patients after radial artery intervention,and to explore the best initial deflation time.Methods:Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)including the effects of different initial decompression time of balloon compression hemostat on postoperative adverse reactions and complications of PubMed,Web of Science,EMbase,China Journal Full-Text Database(CNKI),VIP and WanFang Databases from January 1,2005 to December 15,2021 were searched.Two researchers independently screened and evaluated the qualified literature,and the final literature was determined to be included after the evaluation of the third researcher.RevMan 5.4 software was used for Meta-analysis and R 4.2 software was used for sensitivity analysis.Results:A total of 27 literatures were included,including 5 843 patients.Meta-analysis results showed that compared with postoperative>2 h initial deflation decompression,postoperative 2 h initial deflation decompression showed with lower arterial occlusion(RAO)(RR=4.90,95%CI 1.69-14.24,P =0.003),lower incidence of limb numbness(RR=3.16,95%CI 2.14-4.65,P<0.000 01),and lower incidence of limb cyanosis(RR=4.35,95%CI 2.36-8.02,P<0.01).Compared with initial deflation and decompression after 2 hours postoperatively,initial deflation and decompression within 2 hours postoperatively showed with lower incidence of acute RAO(RR=0.44,95%CI 0.20-0.97,P =0.04),lower incidence of limb swelling(RR=0.41,95%CI 0.27-0.63,P<0.000 1),lower incidence of limb numbness(RR=0.49,the 95%CI 0.34-0.70,P<0.000 1),lower incidence of limb cyanosis(RR=0.37,95%CI 0.18-0.75,P =0.006),and lower incidence of pain at the patient's puncture site(RR=0.50,95%CI 0.34-0.73,P =0.000 3).The sensitivity analysis was performed using the literature-by-exclusion method,and the results did not change significantly before and after exclusion,suggesting that the results of Meta-analysis were stable and credible.Conclusion:The current evidence showed that based on the results of Meta-analysis,the time of initial deflation and decompression of the balloon compression hemostat<2 h after radial artery intervention was more effective than 2 h or>2 h in preventing the occurrence of postoperative acute RAO,swelling of the limbs,limb cyanosis,and pain at the puncture site.

radial artery punctureradial artery occlusioninitial deflation timeTR-Bandsafety

张超、张文龙、白荣、张玙璠、秦纲

展开 >

山西医科大学第一临床医学院(太原 030001)

山西医科大学第一医院(太原 030001)

桡动脉介入术 桡动脉闭塞 初次减压时间 TR-Band 安全性

山西省科技成果转化引导专项项目山西省专利转化专项计划项目

201804D131045202201020

2024

中西医结合心脑血管病杂志
中国中西医结合学会 山西医科大学第一医院

中西医结合心脑血管病杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.463
ISSN:1672-1349
年,卷(期):2024.22(3)
  • 44