首页|不同抗炎药物治疗冠心病有效性和安全性的系统评价

不同抗炎药物治疗冠心病有效性和安全性的系统评价

扫码查看
目的:系统评价不同抗炎药物治疗冠心病的有效性和安全性,以进一步明确冠心病抗炎治疗的理想靶点。方法:计算机检索MedLine、the Cochrane Library、EMbase、Web of Science等数据库,检索抗炎药物治疗冠心病的随机对照试验。使用RevMan 5。3软件对纳入文献进行Meta分析。结果:纳入18篇文献,涉及65 892例病人,Meta分析结果显示,接受抗炎治疗的病人发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的风险较低[RR=0。87,95%Cl(0。79,0。96),尸=0。005],亚组分析提示,白细胞介素(IL)-1拮抗剂[RR=0。87,95%Cl(0。79,0。95),P=0。002]及秋水仙碱[RR=0。61,95%CI(0。48,0。79),P=0。000 1]降低 了病人 MACE 发生风险,差异有统计学意义。抗炎药物对病人全因死亡率没有影响。两组因心力衰竭再住院发生率比较,差异无统计学意义[RR=0。95,95%Cl(0。83,1。10),P>0。05],亚组分析提示,IL-1拮抗剂降低了冠心病病人因心力衰竭再住院发生率[RR=0。12,95%Cl(0。02,0。94),P=0。04]。不良反应方面,甲氨蝶呤增加了病人感染的风险[RR=1。13,95%Cl(1。03,1。24),P=0。01]以及胃肠道不良反应的发生风险[RR=1。23,95%Cl(1。07,1。43),P<0。05]。结论:现有证据表明,抗炎治疗能够减少冠心病病人MACE的发生,而核苷酸结合寡聚化结构域样受体蛋白3(NLRP3)/IL-1/IL-6炎症通路可作为理想的治疗靶点之一。
The Efficacy and Safety of Different Anti-inflammatory Drugs for the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease:a Systematic Review
Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of different anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of coronary heart disease,in order to further clarify the optimal targets of anti-inflammatory treatment of coronary heart disease.Methods:Randomized controlled trials of anti-inflammatory drugs for coronary heart disease were searched from MedLine,the Cochrane Library,EMbase,Web of Science and other databases.RevMan 5.3 software were used for Meta-analysis.Results:A total of 18 literatures were included,including 65 892 patients.The results of Meta-analysis showed that anti-inflammatory therapy patients occurred a low risk of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)(RR=0.87,95%Cl 0.79-0.96,P=0.005),the subgroup analysis showed that interleukin(IL)1 antagonist(RR=0.87,95%Cl 0.79-0.95,P=0.002)and colchicine reduced the risk of MACE(RR=0.61,95%Cl 0.48-0.79,P=0.000 1).Anti-inflammatory drugs showed no effect on all-cause mortality.There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of hospitalization due to heart failure between the two groups(RR=0.95,95%Cl 0.83-1.10,P>0.05).Subgroup analysis showed that IL-1 antagonists reduced the incidence of hospitalization due to heart failure in coronary heart disease patients(RR=0.12,95%Cl 0.02-0.94,P=0.04).In terms of adverse reactions,methotrexate increased the risk of infection(RR=1.13,95%Cl 1.03-1.24,P=0.01)and gastrointestinal adverse reactions(RR=1.23,95%CI 1.07-1.43,P<0.05).Conclusion:The current evidence showed that anti-inflammatory therapy could reduce the incidence of MACE in patients with coronary heart disease,and the nucleotide-binding oligomeric domain-like receptor protein 3(NLRP3)/IL-1/IL-6 inflammatory pathway might be one of the ideal therapeutic targets.

coronary heart diseaseanti-inflammatory drugsmajor adverse cardiovascular eventsMeta-analysissystematic review

刘学谦、范丽花、陈赟虎、陈道鹏、任翔

展开 >

南京中医药大学太仓附属医院/太仓市中医医院(江苏太仓 215400)

冠心病 抗炎药物 主要不良心血管事件 Meta分析 系统评价

国家自然科学基金项目江苏省中西医结合学会青年科技人才托举工程苏州市科技发展计划项目太仓市基础研究计划项目太仓市基础研究计划项目

82305126JSZXTJ-2024-B04SKYD2022059TC2023JCYL03TC2021JCYL05

2024

中西医结合心脑血管病杂志
中国中西医结合学会 山西医科大学第一医院

中西医结合心脑血管病杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.463
ISSN:1672-1349
年,卷(期):2024.22(15)