首页|循经针刺辅助治疗认知言语构音障碍自闭症患儿50例临床观察

循经针刺辅助治疗认知言语构音障碍自闭症患儿50例临床观察

扫码查看
目的 观察循经针刺辅助治疗认知言语构音障碍自闭症患儿的临床疗效。方法 选取2018年12月至2022年12月湖南省儿童医院康复中心收治的100例认知言语构音障碍自闭症患儿,根据建档顺序分为对照组和治疗组,各50例。对照组采用语言认知训练和口肌训练,治疗组在对照组治疗方法的基础上给予循经针刺。2组均连续治疗3个月后观察自闭症治疗评估量表(ATEC)、行为检查量表(ABC)、儿童自闭症发育障碍心理教育量表(C-PEP)、构音清晰度和口部运动功能评分以及患儿遵医情况。结果 治疗前,2组ATEC量表中语言、社交、行为、感知评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05),具有可比性;治疗后,2组ATEC量表中上述评分均低于同组治疗前(P<0。01),且治疗组ATEC量表各维度评分均低于对照组(P<0。05)。治疗前,2组ABC量表中感觉、躯体运动、交往、生活自理、语言评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05),具有可比性;治疗后,2组ABC量表中上述评分均低于同组治疗前(P<0。05),且治疗组ABC量表各维度评分均低于对照组(P<0。05)。治疗前,2组C-PEP量表中口语认知、感知、模仿、粗大动作、认知表现、精细动作评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05),具有可比性;治疗后,2组C-PEP量表中上述评分均高于同组治疗前(P<0。05),且治疗组C-PEP量表各维度评分均高于对照组(P<0。05)。治疗前,2组构音清晰度和口部运动功能(包括舌部运动功能、唇部运动功能、下颌运动功能)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05),具有可比性;治疗后,2组上述功能评分均高于同组治疗前(P<0。01),且治疗组上述功能评分均高于对照组(P<0。05)。对照组遵医率为68。00%(34/50),治疗组为88。00%(44/50),2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 采用循经针刺辅助治疗认知言语构音障碍自闭症患儿,可有效改善患儿的临床症状、行为、构音清晰度以及口部运动功能,提高患儿遵医行为,使得临床推广应用。
Clinical observation on the adjuvant therapy of meridian-based acupuncture for 50 pediatric patients with autism and cognitive-speech articulatory disorders
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of meridian-based acupuncture as adjuvant therapy for pediatric patients with autism and cognitive-speech articulatory disorders.Methods A total of 100 pediatric pa-tients with autism and cognitive-speech articulatory disorders admitted to the Rehabilitation Center of Hunan Chil-dren's Hospital from December 2018 to December 2022 were enrolled and divided into a control group and a treat-ment group based on their filing order,with 50 patients in each group.The control group received language cognitive training and oral muscle training,while the treatment group received meridian-based acupuncture in addition to the treatment methods of the control group.Both groups were treated continuously for 3 months,and the Autism Treat-ment Evaluation Checklist(ATEC),Autism Behavior Checklist(ABC),Childhood Autism Rating Scale(C-PEP),articulatory clarity,oral motor function scores,and patients'compliance with medical advice were observed in both groups.Results Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in language,social,behavioral,and sensory scores on the ATEC scale between the two groups(P>0.05),indicating comparability.After treatment,the scores for language,social,behavioral,and sensory aspects on the ATEC scale were lower in both groups com-pared with those before treatment(P<0.01),and the scores for all dimensions of the ATEC scale were lower in the treatment group than in the control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differ-ences in sensory,somatomotor,social interaction,self-care,and language scores on the ABC scale between the two groups(P>0.05),indicating comparability.After treatment,the scores for sensory,somatomotor,social interaction,self-care,and language aspects on the ABC scale were lower in both groups compared with those before treatment(P<0.05),and the scores for all dimensions of the ABC scale were lower in the treatment group than in the control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in oral cognitive,sensory,imita-tion,gross motor,cognitive performance,and fine motor scores on the C-PEP scale between the two groups(P>0.05),indicating comparability.After treatment,the scores for oral cognitive,sensory,imitation,gross motor,cognitive performance,and fine motor aspects on the C-PEP scale were higher in both groups compared with those before treatment(P<0.05),and the scores for all dimensions of the C-PEP scale were higher in the treatment group than in the control group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in articulato-ry clarity and oral motor function(including tongue motor function,lip motor function,and jaw motor function)scores between the two groups(P>0.05),indicating comparability.After treatment,the scores for these functions were higher in both groups compared with those before treatment(P<0.01),and the scores for these functions were higher in the treatment group than in the control group(P<0.05).The compliance rate with medical advice was 68.00%(34/50)in the control group and 88.00%(44/50)in the treatment group,with a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Meridian-based acupuncture as adjuvant therapy for pe-diatric patients with autism and cognitive-speech articulatory disorders can effectively improve their clinical symp-toms,behavior,articulatory clarity,and oral motor function,and enhance their compliance with medical advice,dem-onstrating clinical practical value.

autismcognitive-speech articulatory disorderschildrenmeridian-based acupunctureoral muscle traininglanguage cognitive trainingclinical observation

胡丽、陈建树、夏琼、王艳

展开 >

湖南省儿童医院康复中心,湖南 长沙 410000

自闭症 认知言语构音障碍 儿童 循经针刺 口肌训练 语言认知训练 临床观察

2024

中医儿科杂志
甘肃中医学院,中华中医药学会

中医儿科杂志

影响因子:0.82
ISSN:1673-4297
年,卷(期):2024.20(6)