首页|RCEP对成员国(地区)农产品贸易的影响——基于关税减让与贸易便利化的视角

RCEP对成员国(地区)农产品贸易的影响——基于关税减让与贸易便利化的视角

扫码查看
[目的]实施区域全面经济伙伴关系协定(RCEP)是中国继加入WTO后又一重大开放成果,本文旨在结合理论与实证从关税减让、贸易便利化的双重视角分析RCEP生效对成员国(地区)(下文简称成员国)农产品贸易的影响。[方法]首先,通过异质性企业贸易理论模型与理论图示,分析关税减让与贸易便利化影响RCEP成员国农产品贸易及福利的内在机理;然后,基于关税减让表测度关税减让幅度,结合进出口通关时间与贸易时间关税等值数据量化贸易便利化程度;最后,在引入贸易时间成本的GTAP模型中利用GTAP第十版数据模拟分析RCEP关税减让与贸易便利化对成员国农产品贸易的影响,并对比分析了二者的作用差异。[结果]①RCEP生效10年后将显著促进各成员国经济增长,与基准情景相比,东盟、韩国、新西兰、日本、澳大利亚、中国的GDP将分别增长1。849%、0。873%、0。469%、0。467%、0。400%、0。396%。以中国为例,贸易便利化对GDP增长的贡献(0。265%)达到关税减让(0。121%)的两倍之多。②RCEP实施后将显著促进各成员国优势农产品的进出口,如中国果蔬、水产品、猪禽肉出口增幅分别为13。83%、8。31%、7。32%,果蔬、牛羊肉、食用油脂的进口增幅分别为16。16%、10。37%、8。89%。③贸易便利化对RCEP成员国农产品尤其是易腐败农产品(果蔬、肉制品、食用油脂)进出口的促进作用明显。④RCEP成员国农产品从区域外的进口将向区域内转移,并使不具有比较优势的农产品对区域内的出口下降。[结论]RCEP实施前除中日、日韩外其他成员国间的双边关税已处于较低水平,RCEP下关税减让空间有限;贸易便利化措施对农产品贸易的促进作用则更为明显。本文有助于把握RCEP给成员国农业带来的机遇和挑战,预估关税降幅空间有限背景下贸易便利化的替代作用。
The impact of RCEP on agricultural trade among members:From the perspectives of tariff concession and trade facilitation
[Objective]The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP)is another major opening-up achievement after China joined WTO.This paper analyzes the impact of RCEP's entry into force on the agricultural trade of member countries(regions)(hereinafter referred to as members)from the dual perspectives of tariff concessions and trade facilitation based on theory and evidence.[Methods]Firstly,the mechanism of tariff concession and trade facilitation affecting agricultural trade and welfare of RCEP members was analyzed through the trade theory model and illustrations of heterogeneous firms.Then,the scale of tariff concession is measured based on the tariff schedule,and the degree of trade facilitation is quantified by combining customs clearance time and trade time tariff equivalent data.Finally,in GTAP model introducing trade time cost,the impact of RCEP tariff concession and trade facilitation on the agricultural trade among members is simulated by using GTAP 10th edition data,and the differences between the two effects are compared.[Results](1)10 years after RCEP comes into effect,it will significantly promote the economic growth of all members.Compared with the baseline scenario,the GDP of ASEAN,South Korea,New Zealand,Japan,Australia and China will increase by 1.849%,0.873%,0.469%,0.467%,0.400%and 0.396%,respectively.In China,for example,trade facilitation contributed twice as much to GDP growth(0.265%)as tariff reduction(0.121%).(2)After the implementation of RCEP,it significantly promotes agricultural trade of advantageous products of members,such as the export growth of China's fruits and vegetables,aquatic products,pig and poultry meat was 13.83%,8.31%,7.32%,and import growth of fruits and vegetables,beef and mutton,edible fats was 16.16%,10.37%,8.89%.(3)Trade facilitation promotes the agricultural trade,especially perishable agricultural products(fruits and vegetables,meat products,edible fats)of RCEP members.(4)The imports of agricultural products from RCEP members outside the region will be transferred to the region,and the exports of agricultural products without comparative advantages to the region will decline.[Conclusion]Before the implementation of RCEP,bilateral tariffs among other members except between China and Japan,and Japan and South Korea have been relatively low,and the room for tariff concessions is limited.Trade facilitation promotes agricultural trade more effectively.This paper helps grasp the opportunities and risks RCEP brings to members'agriculture and estimate the alternative role of trade facilitation in context of limited tariff reduction space.

Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP)agricultural tradetrade fa-cilitationtariff concessionGTAP model

刘子明、王志刚

展开 >

中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院,北京 100872

区域全面经济伙伴关系(RCEP) 农产品贸易 贸易便利化 关税减让 GTAP模型

国家自然科学基金应急管理项目国家自然科学基金面上项目

7184101071773136

2024

资源科学
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 中国自然资源学会

资源科学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.408
ISSN:1007-7588
年,卷(期):2024.46(6)