首页|长江经济带生态用地变化类型识别及驱动因素分析

长江经济带生态用地变化类型识别及驱动因素分析

扫码查看
生态用地能够为人们提供生态产品和生态服务,对于维持生态系统健康与安全有着不可替代的作用.在我国城镇化进程快速推进的过程中,生态用地被大量侵占、受损严重,许多土地生态功能丧失.本研究基于1995‒2015年的土地利用数据,探究长江经济带生态用地变化时空演变规律,并使用地理探测器和地理加权回归模型对于生态用地变化的驱动机制分别开展全局效应与局部效应分析.本研究将生态用地变化划分为5个类型:严重受损、轻微受损、保持不变、轻微恢复、明显恢复.研究结果表明:1995年至2015年,长江经济带生态用地面积呈现先增加后减少的趋势,但是总体的趋势是减少的,受损面积大于恢复面积.其中,减少的面积主要来自于林地和耕地.在这20年间,从生态用地变化类型来看,保持不变类型的面积最大,其次是轻微受损和轻微恢复类型.生态用地变化是多种因素相互作用的结果,而任何两个驱动因子共同作用的解释力都大于单一的驱动因素.此外,根据地理位置的不同,不同驱动因子对于生态用地变化的影响也不同.本文研究结果有助于土地管理者和政策制定者更好地制定区域和地方的相关土地利用政策.相关经验教训也可以推广到其他地区,以更好地管理生态用地,实现可持续发展.
Damage or Recovery? Assessing Ecological Land Change and Its Driving Factors: A Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
Ecological land can provide people with ecological products and ecological services; and it plays an important role in maintaining the health and safety of the ecosystem. With China's rapid urbanization development, ecological land has been invaded in large quantities, and damaged seriously, even resulting in loses of its eco-logical function. Based on land use data from 1995 to 2015, our study explores the spatial and temporal evolution of the damage or recovery of ecological land in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB). Two spatial models, geo-graphic detector and geographic weighted regression (GWR), were employed to assess the global effects and the local effects of the driving factors for ecological land change, respectively. Our study divided the ecological land change into five types based on the degree of change as severe damage, slight damage, unchanged, slight re-covery, and obvious recovery. The results show that from 1995 to 2015, the total area of ecological land in the YREB increased initially and then decreased, but the overall trend was decreasing. The total damaged area was larger than the recovered area. Arable land and woodland both showed downward trends. In terms of ecological land change over the past 20 years, the type of unchanged had the largest area, followed by slight damage and slight recovery. Our study further revealed that ecological land change was the net result of the interaction of many factors, and the explanatory power between any two driving factors was greater than that of any individual driving factor. In addition, driving factors have different impacts on ecological land change in different geographical loca-tions. This knowledge should help land managers and policymakers to be better informed when developing perti-nent land use policies at the regional and local levels. The lessons can also be extended to other regions for better management of their ecological land for sustainable use.

ecological landdamagerecoverydriving factorgeographical detectorgeographically weighted regression

周婷、戚佳玲、徐之寒、周德

展开 >

浙江工商大学土地资源管理系,杭州 310000

浙江省国土整治中心,杭州310007

生态用地 受损 恢复 驱动因素 地理探测器 地理加权回归

National Social Science Fund of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China

19BGL28341301619

2021

资源与生态学报(英文版)
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所

资源与生态学报(英文版)

CSTPCDCSCD
影响因子:0.388
ISSN:1674-764X
年,卷(期):2021.12(2)
  • 6
  • 35