中医肿瘤学杂志2024,Vol.6Issue(1) :97-104.DOI:10.19811/j.cnki.ISSN2096-6628.2024.01.015

中医外治法治疗肺癌相关性咳嗽临床疗效的Meta分析

Meta-analysis on Clinical Efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine External Therapy for treatment of Lung Cancer-related Cough

甘姗珊 姜靖洁 韩阳 刘睿潮 阿格尔 刘玉 焦丽静 许玲 龚亚斌
中医肿瘤学杂志2024,Vol.6Issue(1) :97-104.DOI:10.19811/j.cnki.ISSN2096-6628.2024.01.015

中医外治法治疗肺癌相关性咳嗽临床疗效的Meta分析

Meta-analysis on Clinical Efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine External Therapy for treatment of Lung Cancer-related Cough

甘姗珊 1姜靖洁 2韩阳 1刘睿潮 1阿格尔 1刘玉 1焦丽静 1许玲 1龚亚斌1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 上海中医药大学附属岳阳中西医结合医院,上海 200437
  • 2. 上海市宝山区月浦盛桥卫生服务中心,上海 200942
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 系统评价中医外治法治疗肺癌相关性咳嗽的临床疗效.方法 计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库(VIP)、万方数据库(Wanfang Data)、中国生物医学数据库(SinoMed)、Embase、Cochrane图书馆及Pubmed数据库中中医外治法治疗肺癌相关性咳嗽的随机对照试验文献,文献发表时间为建库至2022年2月28日.采用相对危险度(relative risk,RR)或均数差(mean difference,MD)及对应的95%置信区间(confidence interval,CI)作为效应量指标.使用Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具进行文献质量评价,使用RevMan 5.4及Stata 14.0软件进行数据分析.结果 本研究共纳入8篇文献,研究对象723例,其中试验组362例,对照组361例.Meta分析结果显示,与对照组相比,试验组可提高总有效率[RR= 1.30,95%CI(1.09,1.55),P = 0.004],可提高LCQ评分[WMD = 2.97,95%CI(2.36,3.58),P<0.000 01],可降低VAS评分[WMD=-1.63,95%CI(-3.16,-0.09),P<0.00001],可降低咳嗽症状积分[WMD=-0.93,95%CI(-1.09,-0.77),P<0.00001].共报告3例不良反应/事件,均为轻度不良反应.结论 与单纯使用西医常规治疗相比,单纯采用中医外治或中医外治联合常规西医治疗肺癌相关性咳嗽能够获得更好的临床疗效,能更好地改善患者临床症状,提高患者生活质量,且安全性较好.

Abstract

Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)external therapy for treatment of lung cancer-related cough.Methods The literature of randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of lung cancer-related cough treated by TCM external therapy was retrieved from databases including Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database(VIP),Wanfang Data,Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System(SinoMed),Embase,Cochrane Library,and Pubmed.The collected literature was published from the establishment of each database to February 28,2022.Relative risk(RR)and mean difference(MD)with 95%confidence interval(CI)were used as the effect quantity indicators.The quality of the included literature was evaluated with Cochrane risk assessment manual.RevMan 5.4 and Stata 14.0 were used for statistical analysis.Results A total of 8 articles were included into the study,involving 723 patients,with 362 patients in the experimental group and 361 patients in the control group.The meta analysis results showed that compared with the control group,the total effective rate of the experimental group significantly improved[RR=1.30,95%CI(1.09,1.55),P = 0.004],the LCQ score increased[WMD=2.97,95%CI(2.36,3.58),P<0.000 01],the VAS score decreased[WMD =-1.63,95%CI(-3.16,-0.09),P<0.000 01],and the cough symptom score decreased[WMD =-0.93,95%CI(-1.09,-0.77),P<0.000 01].A total of 3 adverse reactions/events were reported,all of which were mild adverse reactions.Conclusion Compared with using conventional western medicine treatment alone,either using TCM external therapy alone or combining TCM external therapy with conventional western medicine to treat lung cancer-related cough can achieve better clinical efficacy,which can better improve the clinical symptoms of patient and the quality of patients'life with better safety.

关键词

肺癌相关性咳嗽/中医外治/Meta分析

Key words

lung cancer-related cough/traditional Chinese medicine external therapy/Meta-analysis

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家自然科学基金面上项目(82074339)

上海市科学技术委员会自然科学基金(20ZR1459400)

上海市科技技术委员会科研计划项目(19401934400)

上海市卫计委(ZYBZ-2017009)

上海市中医优势病种培育项目()

出版年

2024
中医肿瘤学杂志

中医肿瘤学杂志

CSTPCD
ISSN:
参考文献量16
段落导航相关论文