首页|Passive restoration is often quite effective: response to Zahawi et al. (2014)
Passive restoration is often quite effective: response to Zahawi et al. (2014)
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
Although we share many of the ideas expressed by Zahawi et al., we believe that they are more skeptical in some aspects of the value of passive restoration than we are. Their comment is based primarily on experience within tropical habitats with idiosyncratic legal and social circumstances that limit extrapolations to other habitats. Passive restoration is not always slower than active restoration, and restoration goals should not always focus on rapid development of mature vegetation structure and function. Even less mature vegetation may provide important benefits. A meta-analysis to compare passive and active restoration in a variety of habitats and geographical regions is needed.
active restorationreference sitesrestoration costsrestoration goalsspontaneous succession
Karel Prach、Roger del Moral
展开 >
Department of Biology University of Washington Seattle WA 98195-1800 U.S.A.
Faculty of Science University of Ceske Budejovice Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic
NETL
NSTL
