首页|Corrigendum to ‘PpWRKY22 physically interacts with PpHOS1/PpTGA1 and positively regulates several SA-responsive PR genes to modulate disease resistance in BABA-primed peach fruit’(Scientia Horticulturae (2021) 290, 110479 (S0304423821005860), (10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110479))
Corrigendum to ‘PpWRKY22 physically interacts with PpHOS1/PpTGA1 and positively regulates several SA-responsive PR genes to modulate disease resistance in BABA-primed peach fruit’(Scientia Horticulturae (2021) 290, 110479 (S0304423821005860), (10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110479))
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NSTL
Elsevier
? 2021 Elsevier B.V.The authors regret to not provide the relevant data, including leaf size, leaf biomass, lesion diameter and ratio of trypan blue staining, in original Fig. 5B and C. In the original article, the RESULT on the original Fig. 5B and C showed that the overexpression of PpWRKY22 from P. persica could activate host defence against pathogen invasion with an adverse effect on plant growth. The images in original Fig. 5B and C were enough to support the results/conclusion, but we currently think that we must provide more relevant data, including leaf size, leaf biomass, lesion diameter and ratio of trypan blue staining, for absolutely confirming the dual effect of PpWRKY22 on defence induction and plant growth. The data are very helpful to readers to easily understand the importance of the balance between defence and its allocated costs, because the adverse effect should be highlighted when the inducible disease resistance has been triggered. The experiment of overexpression of PpWRKY22 in transgenic Arabidopsis using T3 seeds with a completely randomized design (CRD) with two replicates were re-conducted from October 6 to November 29 by Chunhong Li, Changyi Lei and Kaituo Wang. All methods in the experiments were applied according to the M&M section in original MS. The corrected Fig. 5 has only supplied the growth parameter, lesion diameter and staining ratio of overexpressor and Col-0 seedlings, and these data are conduce to fully confirming the dual effect of PpWRKY22 on defence induction and plant growth. The representative data from one replicate was used to draw the figure and are provided below (corrected Fig. 5). The four transgenic Arabidopsis lines as provided in corrected Fig. 5B were obtained from one replicate after 5 weeks of incubation, and the actural and staining leaves in corrected Fig. 5C were uniformed and captured from the exactly same leaves. As a consequence, the original Fig. 5 has been replaced by the corrected Fig. 5. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused and state that these additional data do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Li C.、Zheng Y.、Lei C.、Huang Y.、Wang K.
展开 >
College of Food Science and Technology Nanjing Agricultural University
Institute of Three Gorges Research Chongqing Three Gorges University
NSTL
Elsevier
