首页|Seasonal variation and controlling factors of evapotranspiration over dry semi-humid cropland in Guanzhong Plain, China

Seasonal variation and controlling factors of evapotranspiration over dry semi-humid cropland in Guanzhong Plain, China

扫码查看
原文链接
  • NSTL
  • Elsevier
The Guanzhong Plain is a critical food production area in the Yellow River Basin that frequently suffers from water shortages. In this study, long-term (June 2013 to June 2018) water and energy fluxes were observed, and path analysis was conducted over an irrigated winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) / summer maize (Zea mays L.) rotation field to identify the controlling factors of evapotranspiration (ET). Total ET for each crop year ranged from 627 to 775 mm, with an average growing season ET of 398 mm for wheat and 310 mm for maize. There is significant seasonal variation in both ET and surface conductance (Gs). Daily ET varied from 0.0 to 6.0 mm d-1 for wheat and 0.0 to 6.7 mm d-1 for maize. The peak daily values of Gs were 29.5 mm s-1 for wheat and 19.5 mm s-1 for maize. The direct and indirect effects of environmental and biological factors-net radiation (Rn), surface conductance (Gs), saturation vapor pressure deficit (VPD), leaf area index (LAI), air temperature (Tair), and volumetric soil water content (VWC)-on ET were calculated using the path analysis method. Rn was determined to be the primary controlling factor of ET for both the summer maize and winter wheat growing seasons. Also, Gs was found to be another controlling factor that has more controlling power in the summer maize growing season than in the winter wheat season. VPD had a significant positive and direct effect on ET for both of the crop seasons, while it had a significant negative and indirect effect on ET through Gs in the summer maize season. VWC and Tair only directly affected the wheat ET. In addition, VWC had two significant paths that can indirectly affect ET through LAI and Gs. The revealed seasonal patterns and controlling factors of evapotranspiration in this agroecosystem provide a theoretical basis for optimizing water resources management of the Yellow River.

EvapotranspirationEddy covarianceCanopy conductanceControlling factorsGuanzhong plain

Wang, Yunfei、Zou, Yufeng、Cai, Huanjie、Zeng, Yijian、He, Jianqiang、Yu, Lianyu、Zhang, Chao、Saddique, Qaisar、Peng, Xiongbiao、Siddique, Kadambot H. M.、Yu, Qiang、Su, Zhongbo

展开 >

Northwest Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling, Peoples R China

Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat, Enschede, Netherlands

Yangzhou Univ, Coll Hydraul Energy & Power Engn, Yangzhou 225009, Peoples R China

Univ Western Australia, UWA Inst Agr, Perth, WA 6001, Australia

Northwest Agr & Forestry Univ, Inst Water & Soil Conservat, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Yangling, Peoples R China

展开 >

2022

10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107242

Agricultural Water Management

Agricultural Water Management

EISCI
ISSN：0378-3774
年,卷(期)：2022.259
  • 1
  • 72