首页|Corrigendum to ‘Risk perception and resource scarcity in food procurement during the early outbreak of COVID-19’ [Public Health 195 (2021) 152–157] (Public Health (2021) 195 (152–157), (S0033350621001669), (10.1016/j.puhe.2021.04.020))
Corrigendum to ‘Risk perception and resource scarcity in food procurement during the early outbreak of COVID-19’ [Public Health 195 (2021) 152–157] (Public Health (2021) 195 (152–157), (S0033350621001669), (10.1016/j.puhe.2021.04.020))
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域,可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NSTL
Elsevier
? 2021The authors regret the following errors in the originally published version: 1. In Table 1, for the ‘food security status’, the ‘Secure - secure’ category should be ‘391, 16.37%.’ Here is the updated Table 1: [Table presented] 2. In Line 148, it is currently written as ‘Table 3 reveals the relationships among the behavioral changes: the increase in in-store safety perception …’ It should be ‘Line 148: Table 3 reveals the relationships among the behavioural changes: the decrease in in-store safety perception …’ Here is the updated paragraph: Table 3 reveals the relationships among the behavioural changes: the decrease in in-store safety perception was associated with both the decrease in shopping frequency (β = .18, P < .01) and the increase in food expenditure (β = ?7.00, P < .01). Also, people's food security status during the pandemic further impacted the relationship between shopping frequency and food expenditure, as shown by the interaction term (β = ?22.68, P < .01). This result indicates that the mediation effects on food procurement differ among people in different food security statuses. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Wang Y.、Chen X.、Yang Y.、Cui Y.、Xu R.
展开 >
Department of Marketing and Management State University of New York at Oswego
Department of Geography University of Connecticut
Department of Tourism and Hospitality Management Temple University
Institute for Collaboration on Health Intervention and Policy (InCHIP)