查看更多>>摘要:目的 针对临床医学问题设立的首都卫生发展科研专项(简称"首发专项")已运行十余年。本研究旨在追踪并综合评价该基金项目的成果产出情况,为优化临床研究基金的运作模式提供实证支持与建议。 方法 通过在线问卷对首发专项已经结题的1051项课题的所属学科领域、负责人情况、衍生项目、论文、专利、成果转化、成果普及推广等方面进行调查。 结果 在线调查共收集到745项课题,对极端值进行复核后最终纳入720个结题项目。结题数目排序前3位的学科领域分别是肿瘤、心血管疾病和神经系统疾病;项目负责人年龄呈左偏态分布,中位年龄为45岁;319个(44%)项目后续得到了其他相关项目的支持;684个(95%)的项目发表了论文;211个(29%)项目申请了专利及著作权,141个获得了专利授权;78个(11%)项目完成了科技成果的转化,转化方式以转让和许可较多;临床诊疗指标改善中以治疗为主,诊断次之;156个(22%)项目的成果进行了普及推广,成果多推广到二级医院和社区卫生机构。 结论 首发专项学科设置符合当地实际需要,成果产出颇丰。未来,可考虑建立临床研究的综合评价机制,加大推进高质量成果产出力度,加强项目指南设定的组织模式,并进一步完善滚动支持机制。 Objective The Capital′s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (referred to as ″CFH″), established to address clinical medical issues, have been operating for over a decade. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the achievements of this fund and provide empirical support and recommendations for optimizing the operational model of the clinical research fund. Methods An online questionnaire was used to investigate the following aspects of CFH: subject area, the person in charge, derived projects, theses, patents, transformation of results, and popularization and promotion. Results A total of 745 projects were collected through the online survey, and after rechecking for outliers, 720 completed projects were ultimately included. The top three disciplinary domains, in terms of the number of completed projects, were oncology, cardiovascular diseases, and neurological disorders. The age distribution of project leaders exhibited a left-skewed pattern, with a median age of 45 years. 319 (44%) received support from other related projects subsequently. 95% of the projects resulted in paper publication. 211 (29%) projects applied for patents and copyrights, with 141 projects being granted patent authorization. 78 (11%) projects successfully achieved technology transfer, with transfer and licensing being the most common modes. 156 (22%) projects disseminated their outputs, often targeting secondary hospitals and community health institutions. Conclusions CFH aligns with local needs, and the outputs are substantial. In the future, consideration can be given to establishing an evaluation mechanism, increasing efforts to promote high-quality outputs, strengthening the organizational model set by the project guidelines, and further improving the rolling support mechanism.